SR 06:201 - Laserfiche WebLink

I. BACKGROUND On June 1, 1999, the City Council approved the Vineyard Avenue Corridor Specific Plan (V ACSP) and Planned Unit Development (PUD) prezoning/rezoning for the 384-acre Vineyard Avenue Corridor located in southeast Pleasanton. Greg Reznick has submitted a PUD development plan application for a seven-unit residential development on Lot 25 of the Vineyard Avenue Corridor Specific Plan Area. The subject site has two land use designations: Hillside Residential (HR) and Open Space (OS) (please see the Vineyard Avenue Corridor Land Use Plan, Attachment #9). A total of seven residential units are approved for Lot 25: one existing home and six new dwellings in the HR areas. PUD development plan applications are subject to review and approval by the City Council, following recommendation on the plan by the Planning Commission. The Planning Commission's recommendation on the proposed PUD project will be forwarded to the City Council for review and final decision. If the development plan is approved, the applicant must next apply for tentative map approval to allow the lot to be subdivided in accordance with the development plan. Tentative map applications are reviewed and approved by the Planning Commission. The V ACSP requires that a new water storage tank be constructed near the top of Lot 25. The City has submitted a design review application for the water tank and related improvements on Mr. Reznick's property. The City has also requested conditional use permit approval to allow a temporary soil stockpile to be placed on the upper portion of the Reznick property. The design review and conditional use permit applications will be subject to separate Planning Commission review and approval. The City applications have been scheduled for the same Planning Commission hearing as the Reznick PUD. March 8, 2006, Planning Commission Workshop On March 8, 2006, the Planning Commission held a workshop to review the preliminary plans for the single-family development and water tank on the Reznick property. Detailed information on this meeting is provided by the attached Planning Commission minutes. The Commission provided the following comments: . Suggested that there should be additional tree planting along the western fence of the future tank site to screen both the tank and the fence. Staff indicated that additional trees will need to be planted in order to mitigate tree loss and this location will likely be used for additional plantings at a 6: 1 ratio shown on a tree replacement plan. The fence will be constructed 6" into the property line to ensure the maintenance and potential future replacement will be to the obligation of the City alone. Page - 2