SR 06:194 - Laserfiche WebLink

Since Option 2 varies significantly from the project included in the 1986 Expenditure Plan, the Authority will need to amend the 1986 Expenditure Plan to reflect the replacement of the Historic Parkway with Option 2. The review and approval process for Amendment No.2 to the 1986 Expenditure Plan will be similar to the process followed last year for Amendment No.1. The process of securing the necessary approvals is expected to take six months and consists of the following steps: · Develop the Amendment (completed); · Conduct a Public Hearing (held on June 22, 2006); · Approval by MTC (expected by the end of September, 2006); · Approval by the Alameda County Board of Supervisors (expected in August 2006); · Approval by a majority of cities representing a majority of the population in incorporated Alameda County (one by one during July, August and September, 2006); and · ACTA Board Adoption (expected by the end of December, 2006). In addition to replacing the Historic Parkway in the Expenditure Plan, the proposed Amendment No.2 to the 1986 Expenditure Plan also revises the Route 238 improvements between Industrial Parkway and existing Route 84 to reflect the Mission Boulevard Spot Improvements Projects in Hayward, Union City and Fremont. The original Route 238/Route 84 Project included in the 1986 Expenditure Plan was previously revised in Amendment No.1 to the 1986 Expenditure Plan. Amendment No.2 is drafted to reflect the 1986 Expenditure Plan as amended by Amendment No 1. FISCAL IMPACT There is no fiscal impact to the City. Measure B funds are not being moved to or from Pleasanton as a result of this action. 7!Jj"Y 0""00' fD~ RO~ Director of Public Works ~~- Mv David P. Culver Director of Finance Nelson Fialho City Manager Attachment: Resolution Expenditure Plan Amendment (Amendment No.2) SR 06:194 Page 4 of 4