My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
SR 06:204
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2006
>
SR 06:204
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/25/2006 2:45:43 PM
Creation date
8/10/2006 11:36:38 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
STAFF REPORTS
DOCUMENT DATE
8/29/2006
DESTRUCT DATE
15 Y
DOCUMENT NO
SR 06:204
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
44
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />DRAFT <br /> <br />as an example, that the second to the last bullet on page 2 regarding the intersection of Santa Rita <br />Road and Black A venue, is not in the 1996 General Plan or stricken out. She requested <br />clarification from staff. <br /> <br />Ms. Stern explained that these levels of improvements were included in the memo prepared for <br />the August 30, 2005 Joint City Council-Planning Commission Circulation Workshop. She noted <br />that the Background section of the memo described several alternatives, and Alternative A is <br />described as the existing and improved circulation system in Pleasanton with intersection <br />mitigation and gateway constraints that are necessary to satisfy that. She added that they also <br />included some things that were not in the existing General Plan as well. <br /> <br />Commissioner Fox inquired if staff could identify which items on the memo were not in the 1996 <br />General Plan to help clarifY whether what is not included on the memo were dropped or stricken <br />out. <br /> <br />Ms. Stern advised that the information in Attachment I is exactly the same as what was <br />presented in the traffic workshops as the "working draft" circulation network. She indicated that <br />staff is not prepared at this time to do an analysis of what was and was not in the 1996 General <br />Plan. She added, however, that if the Commission had any comments on concerns regarding a <br />specific improvement, staff would pass them on to the Council. <br /> <br />Commissioner Pearce expressed her appreciation for allowing Commissioner Olson and herself <br />to comment on this item as they were absent at the last meeting. She clarified that staff wanted <br />the Commission to comment only on major street extensions and roadway widening issues in <br />order to do the traffic analysis, to look at the bigger picture and not the specific level of detail. <br />Ms. Stern confirmed Commissioner Pearce's statement. <br /> <br />Commissioner Blank noted that some of the items are too detailed and appear not to conform to <br />the concept of the General Plan; for example, the first bullet under "Significant intersection <br />changes" that allows right turn only from Angela Street at Bernal Avenue during peak hours. He <br />inquired if a General Plan amendment would be required should the Traffic Engineer find it <br />necessary to make changes five years down the line. <br /> <br />Chairperson Arkin explained that these are not policies but a "working draft" that the traffic <br />model will use. <br /> <br />Ms. Stern added that some of these items many not be included in the General Plan; however, <br />some of them, such as the triple left-turn lanes, are actually included in the General Plan. <br /> <br />Commissioner Blank stated that some items such as the West Las Positas Boulevard interchange <br />and the Stoneridge Drive extension are big issues that are specifically addressed. He expressed <br />concern, however, about other items which are too specific, such as no right turns during peak <br />hours, and inquired if the General Plan would have to go back to a vote of the people should the <br />Traffic Engineer over time want to change some of these items. <br /> <br />DRAFT EXCERPTS: PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, July 26, 2006 <br /> <br />Page 2 of8 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.