My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
RES 91013
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
RESOLUTIONS
>
1990-1999
>
1991
>
RES 91013
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/3/2012 3:47:44 PM
Creation date
7/27/1999 8:30:28 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
RESOLUTIONS
DOCUMENT DATE
1/22/1991
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
30
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PLEASANTON <br /> <br /> ALAMEDA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA <br /> <br /> RESOLUTION NO. 91-13 <br /> <br /> RESOLUTION APPROVING FERTILE CRESCENT PLAN <br /> CONCEPT <br /> <br />WHEREAS, at its meeting of January 22, 1991, the Director of <br /> Planning and Community Development presented his report <br /> (SR 91:30) regarding a review of the Fertile Crescent <br /> plan concept (South Livermore Valley Plan); and <br /> <br />WHEREAS, the comments of Council shall be transmitted to the <br /> Alameda County Supervisors for consideration as part of <br /> the new County General Plan; and <br /> <br />WHEREAS, after consideration of the report and testimony, Council <br /> recommended approval of the South Livermore Valley Plan <br /> Concept upon certain conditions; <br /> <br />NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PLEASANTON RESOLVES <br />AS FOLLOWS: <br /> <br />Section 1: The City Council of the City of Pleasanton approves <br /> the South Livermore Valley Plan Concept, as set forth in <br /> Staff Report 91:30, subject to the following conditions: <br /> <br /> 1. that the Pleasanton Gateway be redesignated in the <br /> Plan to allow either Agricultural or Residential <br /> use; <br /> <br /> 2. that the density range be revised to allow 0 to 4 <br /> units per acre, subject to a General Plan Study of <br /> the Vineyard Corridor; <br /> <br /> 3. that cultivable lands within the Gateway generally <br /> not be allowed to develop, subject to City- <br /> conducted studies of the area; <br /> <br /> 4. that language be added to clarify that Pleasanton <br /> is the intended jurisdiction for planning and <br /> annexing land within the Gateway; <br /> <br /> 5. that the land be serviced according to City design <br /> standards and levels of service; and <br /> <br /> 6. that the provision to allow the substitution of <br /> cultivable land elsewhere in the Study Area and the <br /> waiver of the $30,000 per unit fee be deleted. <br /> <br /> Section 2: This resolution shall become effective immediately <br /> upon its passage and adoption. <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.