My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
SR 06:185
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2006
>
SR 06:185
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/13/2006 3:46:01 PM
Creation date
7/13/2006 3:21:06 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
STAFF REPORTS
DOCUMENT DATE
7/18/2006
DESTRUCT DATE
15 Y
DOCUMENT NO
SR 06:185
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
13
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />Honorable Mayor and Members ofthe City Council: <br /> <br />BACKGROUND <br /> <br />California voters enacted "The Compassionate Use Act of 1996" (Proposition 215), which <br />allows a person to use marijuana for medical purposes with a doctor's recommendation, without <br />violating State law. Proposition 215 specifically de-criminalized the possession and cultivation <br />of medical marijuana by qualified patients (which includes their caregivers). <br /> <br />Thereafter, in 2003, the State legislature adopted the Medical Marijuana Program (MMP) <br />pursuant to SB 420 (Vasconcellos) which implemented and clarified Prop. 215 by: (a) requiring <br />the State Dept. of Health Services to establish a voluntary identification card program for <br />qualified patients; (b) requiring county health departments to issue such identification cards;2 (c) <br />authorizing the State Attorney General to establish cultivation and possession limits; and (d) <br />authorizing the State Attorney General to establish guidelines to prevent diversion of medical <br />marijuana for non-medical uses. The MMP also de-criminalized the sale or giving away, <br />transportation, and maintenance of a location for sale or giving away, of medical marijuana. In <br />addition, the MMP reserves to cities the power to enact laws consistent with the MMP laws. <br /> <br />However, Proposition 215 is a State initiative that did not change existing Federal law. <br />Pursuant to the Federal Controlled Substances Act (CSA) marijuana is considered a controlled <br />substance without any accepted medical uses, and therefore makes it illegal to cultivate, possess <br />or consume under Federal law. The legal question of whether Federal law superceded <br />Proposition 215 was decided by the United States Supreme Court in 2005 in Gonzales v. Raich. <br />The Raich court generally held that under the Commerce Clause, the Federal government can <br />regulate and prohibit the private growth of marijuana for personal use, even if it is authorized by <br />State law. <br /> <br />Based on this continuing conflict between State and Federal law, cities and counties <br />throughout California have adopted varying approaches to medical marijuana and the related <br />dispensaries.3 <br /> <br />. Approximately 26 cities and counties have adopted ordinances regulating <br />medical marijuana dispensaries within their jurisdictions. Locally, this <br />includes the cities of Berkeley, Hayward, Martinez, Oakland, San Francisco, <br />San Jose, Santa Cruz, Santa Rosa, and Alameda County. Regulations include, <br /> <br />2 City staff contacted the Alameda County Public Health Department and was advised that <br />Alameda County will begin accepting applications for such identification cards in August 2006. <br />3 City staff did not contact each city or county to verifY the status of each ordinance, ban, or <br />moratorium, but relied in information presented by the Contra Costa City Attorney's Assoc. in <br />April 2006 , as well as the Americans for Safe Access website in June 2006 at: <br />http://www.safeaccessnow.net/countyguidelines.htm <br /> <br />SR06:185 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.