My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
SR 06:155
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2006
>
SR 06:155
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/3/2007 2:58:15 PM
Creation date
6/2/2006 10:32:24 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
STAFF REPORTS
DOCUMENT DATE
6/6/2006
DESTRUCT DATE
15 Y
DOCUMENT NO
SR 06:155
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
98
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />Staff recommends Condition No. 9 be revised as follows: <br /> <br />9. Prior to rccordation of thc tinal map, thc applicant shall grant to <br />the City an easement on Let Ii for an cmcrgcncy vchiclc acccss (EV ^) <br />road on the Reznick property. The cxact location of the EV ^ shall be <br />shown on thc tcntativc map and thc applicant shall bc rcsponsiblc for <br />construction ofthc EVA on his property. The u!J!JlieHnt shall Hlse enter <br />into an ugrcemcnt with thc City and deposit adcquate funds with the City <br />te eonstruet that !JeTtion within the projeet boundary. If the EV 1\ is not <br />eonstructed, the funds will be returned to the applieant or his/her heirs. <br />The agreement shall be as revised and approved by the City Attorney and <br />the amount to be depo,;ited shall be determined by the City Engineer. <br /> <br />Issue 2 . Sports Courts <br />PUD-54 condition 18(r) should state that sport courts are not allowed due to visual and noise <br />impacts. Lighted facilities are not appropriate in hillside residential in this location. Because of <br />the location of this development, any sports court would create echoing to all adjacent <br />properties because of the topology and would be a noise impact. There would be no way to <br />buffer the noise to the outside receptors. <br /> <br />Recommendation: No sports courts, lighted or otherwise, shall be located in the hillside <br />residential lots. <br /> <br />Staff concurs and provides a new condition of approval regarding disallowing sport courts: <br /> <br />Sport courts shall not be allowed on any lot in the development. <br /> <br />Issue 3 - Disclosures <br />Since this property is adjacent to my property, lot 24, the same disclosures about pigs should be <br />present for this project as was required for lot 18 because of the proximity to an existing pig <br />operation. A disclosure should be added to state that: <br /> <br />Recommendation: "Animal husbandry activities, including pig farming, of nearby <br />property owners in the Specific Plan area shall be prominently displayed in the <br />sales office for this development and within the CCR's" <br /> <br />Staff concurs and has added this to the disclosures. <br /> <br />Issue 4 - Hours of Construction <br />PUD-54 condition 33 has the hours of construction Monday through Saturday. To be consistent <br />with all other previously issued PUD's in this Plan area, the construction hours shall by Monday <br />through Friday. The only exceptions made to the Monday through Friday restrictions to date <br />have been for Lots 18 and 19 for the construction of New Vineyard Avenue although the rest of <br />the construction on those properties is still Monday through Friday. <br /> <br />PDR-520 has the same issue of construction time as condition 19. This condition should also <br />be changed to Monday through Friday. The location of this development as well as the Reznick <br />homes are in the hills and the noise travels far since there is no way to buffer the noise. The <br /> <br />3 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.