SR 06:155 - Laserfiche WebLink

DRAFT PUD-54. Threehand. LP/Reznick PrODertv Application for Planned Unit Development (PUD) development plan approval to subdivide an approximately 20-acre site into eight-lots, consisting of seven single-family lots for custom homes and one lot for a City water tank. The property is located at 5 Windy Oaks Drive (formerly 1680 Vineyard Avenue) in the Vineyard Avenue Corridor Specific Plan Area and is zoned PUD-HR/OS (Planned Unit Development - Hillside Residential/Open Space) District. Chairperson Arkin inquired whether there were any speakers in the audience who could not appear at the next meeting. Mr. Steve Brozosky requested to speak. THE PUBLIC HEARING WAS OPENED. Steve Brozosky, 1 Brozosky Hill Way, requested to speak regarding Item 6.d.. PUD-54. Threehand. LP/Reznick Prooertv. He indicated that he had submitted an email to the Commission and noted that most of the items had been resolved with the developers during the course of the meeting, particularly with respect to the EVA. He did not believe sports courts should be placed in the hills, which he believed would produce noise and light impacts. The staff cleared up the disclosures and suggested that the disclosure regarding his pigs be included. He noted that the pigs were not there year-round, and some owners may not be aware that they were there. He was satisfied with the visuals. He would like the building heights to remain as they are. He preferred putting trees in, instead of putting money into a forestry fund. He had not had a chance to review the design guidelines and suggested tying it to the tentative map. Greg Reznick, applicant for Item 6.d., noted that the road alignment matters because the manner in which the property on which the water tank will sit gets paid for is by building the road to a specification that allowed him to do his development. He noted that they could not do the water tank until there is enough specs to trade documents and that the road design must be addressed so the property to install the tank could be obtained. Commissioner Arkin moved to continue Item 6.d.. PUD-54. Threehand. LP/Reznick ProDertv. and Item 6.e.. PDR-520/PCUP-162. City of Pleasant on, to the next Planning Commission meeting. Commissioner Fox seconded the motion. ROLL CALL VOTE: AYES: NOES: ABSTAIN: RECUSED: ABSENT: Commissioners Arkin, Blank, Fox, Olson, and Pearce. None. None. None. None. The motion passed. Both public hearing items remained open. DRAFT EXCERPTS: PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, May 10,2006 Page 1 of 1