SR 06:155 - Laserfiche WebLink

seven residential units are approved for Lot 25: one existing home and six new dwellings in the HR areas. This project was first reviewed by the Planning Commission at a March 8, 2006, workshop. For a detailed description of the discussion at this meeting, please see the attached Planning Commission minutes and staff report. The Planning Commission reviewed and recommended approval of the PUD development plan at its meeting of May 24,2006. The application is now before the Council for final decision. If the development plan is approved, the applicant must next apply for tentative map approval to allow the lot to be subdivided in accordance with the development plan. Tentative maps are reviewed and approved by the Planning Commission. The V ACSP requires that a new City water storage tank be constructed near the top of Lot 25. On May 24,2006, the Planning Commission approved the City's design review application for the water tank and related improvements on Mr. Reznick's property. A conditional use permit was also approved to allow a temporary soil stockpile to be placed on the upper portion of the Reznick property. Unless appealed, the City Council will not review the design review and conditional use permit applications for the water tank. PROJECT DESCRIPTION The applicant proposes to create seven single-family lots on the Hillside Residential portions of the property and a water tank lot on a portion of the Open Space area. The existing residence and accessory structures would be demolished. Custom homes would be constructed on all seven of the single-family lots. Design guidelines for the custom homes would be subject to review and approval by the Planning Commission at the time of the tentative map approval. The custom homes would be subject to review and approval by the Planning Commission. Please refer to the attached Planning Commission staff report, dated May 24, 2006, for additional project information. Several items were unavailable at the time of the Planning Commission's review of the PUD so they were deferred for City Council review and approval. These include the drainage plan, the utility plan, the final tree report, and the fire management and open space plan and the peer review of the geotechnical report and photo simulations. These items are discussed below. PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION The Planning Commission held a public hearing on May 10, 2006, to review the subject development plan. However, due to the lateness of the hour, this item was continued to the May 24, 2006, Planning Commission hearing after the Commission received public testimony from Steve Brozosky, who would not be able to attend the next hearing. At the May 24, 2006, Planning Commission hearing, public testimony was received by Mary Roberts. Detailed SR 06:155 Page 3