My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
SR 06:102
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2006
>
SR 06:102
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/5/2007 1:13:34 PM
Creation date
4/20/2006 2:39:25 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
STAFF REPORTS
DOCUMENT DATE
4/25/2006
DESTRUCT DATE
15 Y
DOCUMENT NO
SR 06:102
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
32
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />Lemoine Property: At Workshop #6, a representative of the Lemoine property requested that <br />the City consider the further development potential allowed on this site west of Foothill Road. <br />The 45-acre site was approved for development of 13 lots (which included the existing home <br />site) with PUD-99-0 1. The developable acreage on the site consists of 18 acres designated Rural <br />Density Residential (RDR), yielding 3 units, and 11.6 acres of Low Density Residential (LDR), <br />with a mid-point of 11 units and maximum density of23 units. The maximum density on the <br />site would be 26 units, or 13 units in addition to what is currently approved. Based on the <br />topography of the site and other constraints, staff believes it may not be desirable to develop this <br />site at the maximum end of the density range. Furthermore, development at a density above the <br />mid-point of the density range would require the developer to provide a public amenity <br />sufficient to justify the increased density. If the City Council wished to consider a project above <br />the mid-point density (which would require the provision of an amenity) a few additional units <br />might be developed on the remaining 4.6 acres ofland designated LDR. The number and <br />placement of any additional units would have to be evaluated as part of a future Planned Unit <br />Development application. <br /> <br />Merrit/DeSilva Gates Property: This approximately 46-acre property is located on the east <br />side of Foothill Road, just south of Muirwood Drive and north of Foothill Knolls Drive. The <br />property is outside of the City limits. In 1999 the City Council approved a PUD for 89 single- <br />family homes; however, later that year, the project was the subject of a referendum (Measure P), <br />that was successful and rescinded the pre-zoning and project approval. The property has <br />remained designated for Low Density Residential (LDR) development on the General Plan, and <br />since 1999, the City has received no applications for development. Staff believes the LDR <br />designation, which would allow a mid-point density of 46 units and a maximum of92 units, is <br />still an appropriate density for this infill site, and no further discussion is needed regarding this <br />site as part of the General Plan Update. <br /> <br />Lester Property and the Public Health and Safety Designation: At Workshop #6 it was <br />noted that a portion of the Lester property (approximately 16 acres out ofa total of 120 acres) <br />was designated on the General Plan as Open Space - Public Health and Safety. The 1996 <br />General Plan defines this land use designation as follows: <br /> <br />Public Health and Safety - Land set aside for the protection of the public health and' <br />safety due to geologic, topographic, fire, or other hazards. No development is allowed in <br />these areas other than one single-family home on existing lots of record as of September <br />16, 1986 which meet City requirements for access, public safety, building site and <br />architectural design, etc. <br /> <br />The area designated Public Health and Safety encompasses a heavily wooded canyon and a <br />creek, and is thus consistent with the description of the land use designation. Please note that <br />this portion of the Lester property has been designated as Public Health and Safety at least since <br />1986. <br /> <br />SR 06:102 <br />Page 4 of7 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.