Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> <br />'i(utliJl66e <br />JofCVI <br />Cliair <br /> <br /><JI,p6ert Stans6ury <br />City of Livermore <br />Vice-cliair <br /> <br />:Marslia Jones <br />City of iPfeasanton <br /> <br />([)onna Ca6anne <br />JofCVI <br /> <br />:M071tSpencer <br />Jlfameaa County <br />'/(!cycting 'Boara <br /> <br />:Miclie{fe :Mitclie{[ <br />Liaison <br /> <br />P/DVCjl '['1 OW jl (j)1/1S0CJ(ry' cBOjl CJ((j) <br />jl(tamont Landfi(( SeU(ement jlgreement <br />2005jlnnua(~pon <br /> <br />Background <br /> <br />In 1999, the cities of Livermore and Pleasanton, the Sierra Club and the Northern California Recycling <br />Association (NCRA) entered into a settlement agreement with Alameda County and Altamont Landfill. The <br />Altamont Landfill Settlement Agreement created the Altamont Education Advisory Board to propose <br />allocation of funds in the Education Account for recycling education programs, job training in the field of <br />waste prevention and recycling and mitigating the impacts of the landfill operations in the affected <br />community. Funds generated from the $0.28 per ton surcharge amount to approximately $325,000 annually. <br /> <br />There are five voting members on the Education Advisory Board: one appointed by the Livermore City <br />Council; one appointed by the Pleasanton City Council; two appointed by NCRA; and the Alameda County <br />Recycling Board's environmental educator. <br /> <br />The role of the Education Advisory Board is to annually propose the allocation of funds from the Education <br />Account by submitting an Expenditure Plan by April I of each year. Concurrence of Alameda County, the <br />cities of Livermore and Pleasanton, and NCRA in the Expenditure Plan is necessary before funds are <br />allocated. <br /> <br />Funds are collected from the Altamont Landfill by the Alameda County Treasurer. The County then transfers <br />the annual allocation to the City of Livermore for disbursal to grant recipients. <br /> <br />2005 Activities <br /> <br />The 2005 Expenditure Plan was approved by each ofthe parties in early spring 2005. The Expenditure Plan <br />proposed the following allocations: <br /> <br />Mini-grants <br />Project grants <br />Board initiated projects <br />ALARM mitigation projects <br />Fund administration <br /> <br />$50,000 <br />$200,000 <br />$50,000 <br />$10,000 <br />$15.000 <br /> <br />$325,000 <br /> <br />TOTAL <br /> <br />Based on the allocation established by the Expenditure Plan, the Education Advisory Board released a Request <br />for Proposals for mini-grants and project grants pursuant to the guidelines established in the settlement <br />agreement. <br /> <br />The Education Advisory Board received 20 grant applications totaling over $400,000 in fimding. The <br />Education Advisory Board evaluated the applications and made the following grant awards. <br /> <br />Mini-grants <br /> <br />The Education Advisory Board received ten mini-grant applications (up to $1,500 each). Four of the mini- <br />grant applications met the grant criteria and were awarded, as follows: <br /> <br />Valley View Elementary School, Pleasanton - $4,500 for three separate mini-grants for recycling and <br />composting program implementation and infrastructure; <br /> <br />Marylin Avenue School, Livermore - $1,485 for environmental education materials. <br /> <br />A total of $5,985 was awarded from the mini-grant total funding allocation of $50,000 leaving a fund balance <br />of$44,015. The Education Advisory Board has reissued the mini-grant application announcement and will <br />entertain proposals for mini-grants throughout the year. The 2006 Expenditure Plan recommends increasing <br />the cap on the mini-grant award amount to $2,500 to make the mini-grant program more attractive to schools <br />and teachers. The 2006 Expenditure Plan recommends allocating only $10,000 in new funding for the mini- <br />grant program. Funds remaining from the 2005 mini-grant allocation can be used for mini-grants awarded in <br />2006. <br />