My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
RES 95024X
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
RESOLUTIONS
>
1990-1999
>
1995
>
RES 95024X
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/2/2012 11:10:33 AM
Creation date
2/25/1999 5:48:59 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
RESOLUTIONS
DOCUMENT DATE
2/21/1995
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
335
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Introduc~n <br /> <br /> County portion of Tri-Valley. The TVTC joint powers agreement states that member <br /> jurisdictions are to consider the Tri-Valley Transportation Plan when adopting or <br /> Amencllng the circulation elements of general plan.% specific plnn~, zoning ordinances, or _ <br /> capital improvement programs. <br /> <br /> The consultant team began meeting with Tri Valley representatives in November, 1991. <br /> Meetings were held once each month with the Tri-Valley Technical Advisory Committee ' <br /> (TAC). This committee provided guidance to the consultant and reviewed all work <br /> products prior to their submittal to the Tri Valley Technical Council (TVTC). The TVTC <br /> acted as the final approval body for all work completed by the consultant. Meetings ' <br /> between the TVTC, TVTAC, and the consultant Also occurred on a monthly basis. <br /> <br /> Figure 1-1 shows the boundaries of planning areas used to summarize data in this report. " <br /> These boundaries have no planning status except within this report, although attempts <br /> have been made to conform to city and sphere of influence boundaries. <br /> <br /> Routes of Regional Significance have been adopted by each city in Contra Costa County, <br /> as well as the County, as part of the Measure C Growth Management ProgrAm, Routes of <br /> Regional Significance are those roads that serve regional mobility, or act as reliever - <br /> routes for the regional system, and serve more than one jurisdiction. The designated <br /> routes are exempt from the Measure C basic route level of service standards. Other <br /> measures, Traffw Service Objectives are to be adopted for these routes. The plan also -- <br /> includes Routes of Regional Significance for Alnmeda County, although these are not <br /> mandated by county policy (see Figure 1-2). <br /> <br /> Compliance Requirements on Regional Routes <br /> <br /> Requirements for compliance with the provisions of the Growth Management Progrnrn <br /> relating to Routes of Regional Significance are: <br /> <br /> 1. Participation in development and adoption of Action Plans: Action Plans will be <br /> developed through the work of the Regional Committees. <br /> <br /> 2. Implementation of actions designed to attain traffic service objectives consistent with <br /> adopted Action Plan: Action Plans will specify actions to be taken by each jurisdiction. <br /> All localities will agree to the actions before the Plans are fmalized and adopted, After - <br /> adoption, cities and the county will have an obligation to implement specified actions <br /> consistent with the time frame of the Action Plan. <br /> <br /> 3. Placing conditions on project approval consistent with Action Plan policies: Some <br /> Action Plan policies may require implementation on an ongoing b~is through the <br /> imposition of conditions on development approvals. These might relate to payment of _ <br /> mitigation fees, implementation of TSMffDM measures, or phasing of development <br /> relative to infrastructure improvements. <br /> <br />Barton-Aschman Associates, Inc. 2 ~ <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.