My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
RES 95012
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
RESOLUTIONS
>
1990-1999
>
1995
>
RES 95012
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/2/2012 10:57:41 AM
Creation date
2/25/1999 5:35:03 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
RESOLUTIONS
DOCUMENT DATE
1/17/1995
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
11
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
permanent construction. More details will be presented to Council <br /> before the funds are actually appropriated. Staff would <br /> incorporate reimbursement from developer fees for the expansion <br /> into the 1995-96/1999-2000 CIP. <br /> <br /> Staff is recommending that $198,575 be used in recognition of the <br /> cooperation and cost containment efforts made by staff in order to <br /> balance the budget. This expenditure will take the form of a one- <br /> time payment of $650 to all Police (POA), Miscellaneos (PCEA), <br /> Confidential, and Management employees. <br /> <br /> In 1994-95, the City appropriated $300,000 to begin upgrading <br /> computer mainframe hardware and software, and for the first phase <br /> of implementing a city-wide network. Staff estimates that an <br /> additional $150,000 is needed to complete subsequent phases of <br /> these projects, which primarily involve upgrading existing personal <br /> computer (PC) hardware and software throughout the entire City. <br /> The current project will only upgrade about 40-50% of existing PCs. <br /> Therefore, staff is recommending that $120,000 be transferred to <br /> the Data Processing Replacement Fund to be used for future upgrade <br /> phases, with additional funding requests in future budget years, as <br /> needed. Staff will return to Council with a detailed plan before <br /> the funds will actually be appropriated. <br /> <br /> Attachment B to this report reflects the balances in'the General <br /> Fund Reserves if staff's recommendations are adopted. <br /> <br /> OTHER POTENTIAL USES <br /> <br />At least one member of the City Council has expressed a desire to <br />utilize some of these funds for community groups. Staff does not <br />recommend that action for these particular funds. Because the <br />funds came from one-time revenue sources and budget savings, staff <br />recommends that they be used for the underfunded CIP, for <br />facilities and equipment to enhance staff productivity, and as an <br />incentive for staff to continue efficiency and cost containment <br />efforts in the day to day operations. <br /> <br />Instead of disbursing one-time money to community groups, staff <br />recommends that financial support for them be addressed as an <br />ongoing program in the Operating Budget; that the City's current <br />process for determining community grants be refined to include <br />separate review and funding for youth/cultural activities, as <br />recommended by the Human Services Commission; and that the level of <br />current community funding be reviewed and updated for the upcoming <br />fiscal year, if appropriate. We are about to begin that process. <br />If Council wishes to identify the amount of funding at this time, <br />staff can incorporate the amount into the 1995-96 budget, or ask <br />the Human Services and Park & Recreation Commissions for a <br />recommendation. Any amount approved at this time could be reviewed <br />by those commissions for recommendation to appropriate groups as a <br /> <br />SR95:32 <br /> 4 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.