My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
RES 96141
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
RESOLUTIONS
>
1990-1999
>
1996
>
RES 96141
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/27/2012 4:39:06 PM
Creation date
2/24/1999 7:58:41 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
RESOLUTIONS
DOCUMENT DATE
12/3/1996
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
2
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PLEASANTON <br /> <br /> ALAMEDA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA <br /> <br /> RESOLUTION NO. 96-14 1 <br /> <br /> RESOLUTION APPROVING A NEGATIVE <br /> DECLARATION FOR THE APPLICATION OF <br /> SECURITY TRUST COMPANY FOR AN <br /> AMENDMENT TO THE DEVELOPMENT <br /> AGREEMENT <br /> <br />WHEREAS, at its meeting of December 3, 1996, the City Council received a proposed <br /> negative declaration for the application of Security Trust Company, as <br /> Trustee for Stoneridge Regional Shopping Center, for an amendment to the <br /> Development Agreement which would: (1) extend the term of the <br /> Agreement for five years; (2) allow an additional development of 220,000 <br /> square feet (in addition to the 178,000 square feet of approved, but not <br /> built, development) of leasable floor area in additional department stores, <br /> specialty stores, and/or additional mall stores; (3) establish revised <br /> minimum parking ratios; and (4) establish owners' obligations for further <br /> traffic mitigation improvements; and <br /> <br />WHEREAS, the City Council has received and reviewed the Initial Study dated <br /> November 1, 1995, and received the recommendations of the staff and <br /> Planning Commission; and <br /> <br />WHEREAS, a duly noticed public hearing was held at which time the public was given <br /> the opportunity to comment on the environmental impacts of the proposed <br /> Development Agreement amendment; and <br /> <br /> WHEREAS, the City Council has reviewed the potential impacts in accordance with the <br /> applicable state and local guidelines governing the preparation of Negative <br /> Declarations and Environmental Impact Reports; and <br /> <br /> WHEREAS, the City Council fmds that the proposed Development Agreement <br /> amendment would not have any significant adverse effects on the <br /> environment; and <br /> <br /> WHEREAS, the City Council further finds that the proposed project will have no <br /> potential for adverse impacts on the site's wildlife; <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.