RES 96007 - Laserfiche WebLink

Section 7 of this C'han~c of Control Con~nt A~rcement, Grantor agrees to cnnpPxatP. with ( ~rnntt, c in providinl~ information and docurm~ntation ne~.ess~ry tar she. c~qnr, e,I lotinn of the $1 ,(XX I,fRX) bond required by this Section 6. TCIC agre~.~ mhat the. cn.q nf the ,~ 1,00(),0(X'} cnnstructlon performance bond wiX1 not be passed lhrtmgh tn .~uh.~crihers a.~ an external h-arlcllise cOSt aS ticscribed in I~CC Regulations Set:tion~ '/fi.9'/.'./. nnti 76.9'25. Seenon 7.3(o.) of the Franchi~ Agreement is hereby deletr. d and substituted in its entirety to read as tOllOwg: "Upon compledon of the Pleasanton portion of the voluntary system upizacle currently under construction in the City o[ Livcnttor~ duc tv be completed no later than D~cuxnlx:r 31, 1996, oa= 0~t~ will provide to Grantor a total of oarc~ (3) PEG a~.s.~ uhmm~ls, to be used exclusively by th~ Oranu~r 'awl oa~ citic~ vr Liv~t'm~zc, Dubl iu and San Ramon. Th~ Cyr-dlltor, in cotilt~;tivtl with oa~ citit~s o~[ Livermor~, Dublin and San Ra,,~on, sla'.dl designate one of the thxec PEiG charinch to be a shared d,mmel with leased access programming in accordance with l'edm'al law. Grantor agmees to 'allow Grantee to place leased arxess prOgr'an',Tmin$ on the shelf4 channel, using any ~ slots not used by the Grautor and the cities of Livcrmon:, Dublin and San Rumon. Grautor and the cities of Livcrmorc. Dublin and San llnmon will have full aud complete control of charreel schexiuliag and program content on PEG channels, in accordance with feclaral law. Grantor and the cities of Livermore, Dublin and San Ramon flail prescfib~ rules and proendures for Franchisee's use of unused PEG channel capacity in accordance with 47 USC 531 (d)." As a part of the lxansfer, TCIC, on behalf of the Grantee, alFees and aekaowle. dge. s that: a) this -.,plyroving af, m~ment is not n new franchise agreement. tim granting of a franchise. or the rene. wal of the existing £rauchise, but rather is exclusively an .qgre.~-.me. nt to the change or' control of the Grantee and neither aft~'t:ts nor lmre-je,diee-~ m any way the Grantnr's fighL~ thereunder: and b) that eampliaue~ with tbe iarancht~e... $ of the clam o1' tl~ closing of the Transactions. Is neither commew.,a,y imlnmcticahle $ the term is used in SecUon 625(f). of the Cable Communic:atiuns Policy Act nf 19R4. 81qd/or the Cable Television Consumer Promotion and Competitiun Act uf 1992 tc~ileetively the "Cable Act") nor eeouomically infeusible upou Oat; clueinS u[ Oa~ m;lsism~l~ Of co,its'el based on (1) any and all debt service incumxl, or tu Lm: inuuts'~d, to disectly or indirr, ctly f, nau~ the -t-