Laserfiche WebLink
2. Loss of Golf Course Homes. Alternative 2 eliminates the homes planned for the <br /> golf course. This reduces property tax revenues, as well as economic stimulus <br /> from jobs related to construction. Furthermore, the elimination of the golf course <br /> homes makes the development of the municipal golf course economically more <br /> difficult, as the City may not generate sufficient revenues from green fees and <br /> clubhouse sales to maintain its debt service for this new recreational amenity. <br /> <br /> 3. Biology. Alternative 2 would have environmental effects which are functionally <br /> equal to the proposed Project, and this alternative would not substantially reduce <br /> any environmental effects of the Project. While there may be some reduction in <br /> the area of wetlands or waters of the United States impacted because of a smaller <br /> golf course, that biological effect will continue to be present so long as the golf <br /> course remains an element of the project. <br /> <br />Alternative 3: ONE-ACRE DENSITY INSIDE THE HAPPY VALLEY LOOP / GENERAL <br /> ELECTRIC PROPERTY <br /> <br /> Alternative 3 would include an expanded area (including expanded golf course, open <br />space and trails), as well as an increase of up to a tot~t of211 housing units. Land use impacts <br />would remain similar, subject to the slight increase in allowable housing units. The noise <br />generated by the traffic under Alternative 3 would result in a noticeable increase for existing <br />residents along Happy Valley Road, Alisal Street and Sycamore Road. Furthermore, the <br />expansion of the golf course by an additional 15 acres would result in increased impacts on <br />wetlands and waters of the United States. <br /> <br /> Therefore, based on the facts set forth below, and the information in the Draft EIR and <br />Final EIR, Chapter 4.B., the City Council finds that Alternative 3 is less desirable than the <br />proposed Project, and rejects Alternative 3 for the following reasons: <br /> <br /> 1. Noise. The increase in density inside the Happy Valley Loop changes traffic <br /> patterns, which results in increased noise impacts to neighborhoods along Happy <br /> Valley Road, Alisal Street and Sycamore Road. Such concern regarding noise is <br /> heightened in this area of the City which has been planned as semi-rural residential. <br /> <br /> 2. BiOlogy. The increase in the footprint of the golf course includes an additional 15 <br /> acres on the GE Company property. Grading and re-contouring these acres will <br /> result in increased impacts on wetlands and channels. <br /> <br /> 3. Same or Greater Impacts. Alternative 3 would have environmental impacts which <br /> are equal to or greater than the Project, and this alternative would not substantially <br /> reduce any significant environmental effect of the Project. <br /> <br />Exhibit B 4 <br /> <br /> <br />