Laserfiche WebLink
(iii) the difference between $425,000 and $152,560 is <br />$272,340 which constitutes the amount paid in excess of such allot. able share. <br /> <br />Assume that (1) Developer, as the next Contributing Project, is required to fund an <br />additional Traffic Mitigation Improvement, the actual cost of which is $325,000, anct (2) <br />Developer's total Estimated Required Payment is $250,000. If Developer obtained a <br />building-permit for Developer's total project (604,750 square feet), a Reimbursement <br />Fee would then be payable to Developer in the amount of $75,000 (namely, the <br />difference between $325,000 and $250,000). Assume further that an additional <br />Contributing Project is constructed at a time when no additional Traffic Mitigation <br />Improvement must be constructed, and that such Contributing Project pays to the City, <br />at issuance of the building permit therefor, its Estimated Required Payment of $100,000 <br />(including the accrual factor, to the extent applicable, referred to in Section 5.b. above). <br />Said $100,000 would be paid by the City, by way of partial pro rata repayment of <br />Reimbursement Fees, to Sears ($78,000) and to Developer ($22,000), which payments <br />reflect a proportional allocation between Sears (owed a Reimbursement Fee of <br />$272,340) and Developer (owed a Reimbursement Fee of $75,000). <br /> <br />As provided in Section 5.b. above, an accrual factor (at the Prime Rate) shall be added <br />to unpaid Reimbursement Fees. By way of illustration utilizing the foregoing example, <br />assume that the $100,000 is paid by the City to the first Contributing Project and to <br />Developer two years and one year, respectively, after each had advanced funds to pay <br />for the particular Traffic Mitigation Improvement required at the time their respective <br />building permits were issued; assume further that the Prime Rate was 8%% per annum <br />during the two-year period referred to and the two year period commenced after <br />January 1, 1998. The total Reimbursement Fee due the first Contributing Project would <br />be the sum of $272,340 plus approximately $46,300 (namely, two years' accrual at 8% <br />on $272,340), or a total of $318,640. Similarly, the total Reimbursement Fee due <br />Developer would be $75,000 plus $6,375 (one years accrual at 8% on $75,000), or a <br />total of $81,375. Using the foregoing figures, the $100,000 would be allocated $79,700 <br />to the first Contributing Project and $20,300 to the Developer, in proportion of the total <br />Reimbursement Fees (including the accrual) owed to each at the date of <br />reimbursement by the City. <br /> <br /> f. Mall Expansion. If the approval requested is for a mall <br />expansion not involving an anchor store (such as Sears), City shall require payment of <br />Reimbursement Fees by the Contributing Project as a condition of approval on the <br />following basis. The payment of the Reimbursement Fees shall be based on the <br />number of peak hour trips which the use generates based on 2.8 trips/1000 square <br />feet. In all other respects the provisions of subsections b. and c. above shall apply. <br /> <br /> (AGREEMENTS~SRIDG1CL.SAM) 9 <br /> <br /> <br />