PC 082405 - Laserfiche WebLink

Chairperson Maas suggested that some benches would be a good addition if an entire outdoor patio is not included. Commissioner Fox noted that she liked the design and did not have problems with a retail use as long as it was not ahigh-traffic use like a video store. She noted that there were not many places to eat in this area. Shc expressed concern about vinyl window signs and would prefer that the conditions of approval specify that no vinyl window signs be allowed in that complex- Mr_ Mahoney noted that he would incorporate that request into the Master Sign Program. Commissioner Fox would like to see a crosswalk to accommodate pedestrian flow if a restaurant is to be placed on the site. She would support outdoor seating and would like to see a small Fountain to mitigate the noise from the carwash_ Chairperson Maas suggested that a different type of pavement from the street be used if a crosswalk is to be installed; however, she did not want the applicant to go to extraordinary expense. Commissioner Fox noted that she liked the design. Commissioner Pearce complimented the applicant on the design and in incorporating the previous comments. She would be interested in seeing the results of the traft3c survey. Mr. Mahoney advised that they conducted very thorough conversations with staff with respect to traffic issues and. understood what other applicants would do in terms of hours of operation. He noted that the uses' impacts on peak-hour traffic were dependent upon the tenant, the type of business, and the hours of operation. He would continue to discuss these items with staff. THE PUBLiC HEARING WAS CLOSED. No action was taken. b_ PUD-38_ Lvnn Jansen Application for PUD development plan approval for the construction of 1 1 new homes, ranging in lot sizes from 10,000 square feet to 12,984 square feet, on a 4.3-acre parcel located at 1635 and 1777 Rose Avenue. "Coning for the property is PLTD-MDR and A (Planned Unit Development -Medium Density Residential and Agriculture District Also consider the Negative Declaration prepared for the prof ect This item was continued to a future Planning Coiriinission meeting. PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES August 24, 2005 Page 6 of 11