PC 062205 - Laserfiche WebLink

Chairperson Maas noted that there had been some concern over documentation that was given to the Commission aRer the meeting by two speakers. Ms. Decker noted that staff had not completed the task of reviewing the recording and would bring the minutes back to the Conn mission on July 13, 2005. Commissioner Arkin inquired whether "Policy X" had been defined in the minutes. Ms_ Decker advised that would also be included in the minutes_ 3_ MEETING OPEN FOR ANY MEMBER OF THE AUDIENCE TO ADDRESS THE PLANNING COMMISSION ON ANY ITEM WHICH IS NOT ALREADY ON THE AGENDA_ There were none. 4_ REVISIONS AND OMISSIONS TO THE AGENDA Ms. Decker advised that staff had received a large volume of correspondence and additional inFormation regarding Item 6.£_ PDUP-8_ Vilas and Me:?ha Thuse and did not have adequate time to review, assess, and analyze those items. She stated that there continued to be significant concern from the neighborhood and suggested that the Commission continue this item to the meeting of July 13, 2005_ She noted that it would be the t3rst item on the agenda. There was Commission consensus to continue the item to the meeting of July 1 3, 2005. Chairperson Maas emphasized that it would be axtrem ely important for the applicant to work with staff to reach resolution on some of the items_ Ms_ Dccker then advised that the order of items to be heard would be- ltem 6_a_ -Energy Element of the General Plan Item 6. d. PUD-81-22-1 IM, Charles Schwab Company, Inc_ Item 6_e_ PAP-78, Charles Meier, Appellant (PADR-1235, Jeffrey and Cindy True Item 6_b_ PCUP-144, Don Carter, Golden State Cabinetry Item 6.c. PAUP-1, Mark and Kristina Backer Itam 6_g. PUD-46, City of Pleasanton S_ MATTERS CONTINUED FOR DECISION There were none. PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES June 22, 2005 Pagc 2 of 20