My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
PC 052505
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
MINUTES
>
2000-2009
>
2005
>
PC 052505
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/5/2017 3:21:01 PM
Creation date
3/9/2006 9:27:34 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
5/25/2005
DOCUMENT NAME
PC 052505
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
23
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Commissioner Fox had an issue with the wording "to establish an Energy Manager position at <br />the City o£ Pleasanton" and did not believe that sta£F ng recommendations should be included in <br />a General Plan. She preferred that it be reworded to say: "Establish guidelines to increase <br />renewable energy use, energy conservation efforts, and energy self-sufficiency efforts in the <br />City" and strike the language about an Energy Manager position. <br />Commissioner Blank Holed that it could be worded to "consider the establishment o£_ _ ." <br />Commissioner Roberts noted that a planner could be assigned to cover that work_ <br />Commissioner Fox noted that there were no positions in the City to oversee air quality, noise, or <br />every other element of the General Plan_ She believed it would be up to the City Council and the <br />City Manager to determine how that should be addressed rather than the requirement being <br />placed in the General Plan. <br />There was general consensus with CJommissioner Fox's comment <br />On Policy 2.5, Coi~nmissioner Blank requested that the word "consider" be dropped. He believed <br />the City should be developing educational pro grarns_ <br />Commissioner Roberts did not Like the regulations included in Policy 3_ <br />Commissioner Fox believed that guidelines would be preferable to regulations. She would like <br />to combine Program 3.4 and 3_S and not have a required resale retrofit. Instead, language could <br />be included to "develop educational materials to assist property owners in implementing <br />energy-e£Picient upgrades." <br />Commissioner Roberts noted. that the real estate community had not had a chance to weigh in on <br />this language; she believed they would have objections to the language. <br />Commissioner Blank believed that the requirements for resale would be problematic and <br />suggested. considering certain measures for new construction or reprooting_ He did not believe a <br />40-year-old home should be re-roofed prior to sale. <br />Commissioner Roberts suggested that homeowners considering re-rooting be given this <br />information, but did not believe it should be in the General Plan_ She believed that Program 3.5 <br />could include the language "if feasible" but that she would prefer that it be dalatad_ <br />Commissioner Arkin advised that with respect to Policy 33, he had not seen solar water heaters <br />in a long time. <br />Commissioner Roberts noted that the City already practiced Policy 4.2. <br />Commissioner Fox noted that in Policy 4.3, the language should read "when feasible and <br />co st-effective _ " <br />PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES May 25, 2005 Page 5 of 23 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.