My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
PC 042705
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
MINUTES
>
2000-2009
>
2005
>
PC 042705
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/5/2017 3:20:43 PM
Creation date
3/9/2006 9:12:52 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
4/27/2005
DOCUMENT NAME
PC 042705
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
13
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Commissioner Arkin supported those recommendations. <br />Commissioner Roberts moved to recommend approval of PUD-99-O1-3M with the <br />following added conditions recommended by staff. <br />1_ Any design for fencing shall h¢ compatible with the approved architectural <br />components, with additional landscaping to soften the fencing and not including <br />lattice, and shall b¢ submitted to the Planning Director for approval prior to <br />issuance of a building occupancy permit; <br />2_ Any additional requests for solid fencing shall come before the Planning <br />Commission for approval; <br />3_ The dashed section of open fence recommended by staff may b¢ solid fencing; and <br />4_ Additional landscaping to camouflage the fence shall b¢ added and submitted to the <br />Planning Director for review and approval~ <br />Commissioner Fox seconded the motion~ <br />THE PUBLIC HEARING WAS REOPENED~ <br />Mr_ Rowe stated a point of clarit3cation that the drawing of the fence example would be sent to <br />staff as soon as possible and added that one or two homes had already been closed- He wished to <br />have enough time to allow new occupants to move into their homes. <br />THE PUBLIC HEARING WAS CLOSED_ <br />Ms. Decker suggested that a time period be included to allow the first two properties to be sold; a <br />30-day time period would allow enough time to provide the drawings to staff. <br />Mr. Rowe advised that four lots would he closing within the next 30 days. These conditions <br />would be included in the disclosure statements~ <br />Commissioner Blank supported Commissioner Arkin's statement that the City he very careful <br />with the view lines and that it would be preferable that the City err on the side of caution by <br />leaving them open. The applicant may install a solid fence where the dotted line is and correct <br />the privacy issues; then it may he possible to determine any further solid fencing. <br />Commissioner Fox proposed an amendment that staff ensure that the landscaping plan <br />does not obscure the view. <br />Commissioner Blank suggested that the Planning Commission evaluate the fencing issue after <br />the impact of closing off the first phase of fencing has been determined. <br />PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES April 27, 2005 Page 7 of 13 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.