PC 040705 - Laserfiche WebLink

_-. 2. Future building developers shall work with the Mariposa Ranch Design Review Board and the Planning Department to implcnicnt the applicable L7S Green Building standards on exterior building and site lighting, with the objective of reducing light glare. 3. Future building applicants and hotneowners arc encouraged to use best management practices for the use of pesticides and herbicides, similar to the integrated pest management program used ou the golf course~ 4. Future building applicants shall explore with the Mariposa Ranch Design Review Board and the Plarirting Department staff the storage and use of recycled gray water, rain water, etc. for landscape irrigation- s. Future building applicants are encouraged to use permeable paving for on-site driveways, sidewalks, patios, etc_ 6. The appeal period of the Zoning Administrator's action for the new homes in the development shall be 20 calendar days from the date of approval If the 20~~' day falls on a weekend or holiday where City of Pleasatitoti offices are closed, the appeal period shall extend to the Monday following the weekend or the first business day following the holiday. 7. A list of all green building measures in the home designs i2~r this development shall be provided for the review and approval of the Planning Director with the applications for design review approval. Each home shall be designed to include a minimum of 50 points using the Alameda Couniy Waste Mai~agenient Authority's Green Points system with a minimum of ten points in each category Resources, Energy, and IAQ/Health. Commissioner Arkin suggested that the state-of--the-art methods mentioned in Condition No. 2 not be specified because of the variety of new technology available to consuir~ers, including wireless access. Ms_ Ncrland advised that the overall guidelines had been approved by City Council_ G'onimissioner Blank noted that the condition used "e.g." <for exampled and not "i.e." (that is). Commissioner Arkin agreed. THE PUBLIC HEARING WAS C)1PENED_ David Bogstad, project architect, noted that the applicant was cotrimitted to building the structure well and plans to sell it; he believed this project would be visually special. "1'he applicant was looking forward to commencing construction. Related to the Council-amended conditions and in response to an inquiry by Commissioner Blank regarding lighting, Mr_ Bogstad confirmed that mercury vapor lights would not be used. Regarding herbicides and pesticides, Mr. Bogstad stated that non-nitrate chemicals would be utilized, such as what he has used in "I'~hoe. Kevin Close, 871 Sycamore Road, expressed concern about the water level and the - treatment of gray water next to a wetland. Pl,ANNINCi COMMISSION MINUTES April 7, 2005 Page 6 of 15