PC 022305 - Laserfiche WebLink

Commissioner Blank advised that the sentence on paragraph 2 of page 21 should be modified to read as follows: "Commissioner Blank requested that staff assist the Commission i~r~g to access enabling technology that would allow them or staff to s-eurch-official City documents for references to various items in Specifzc Plans, such as t~identifying all restroom references that might he contained in the Downtown Specifrc Plan as it pertained to the Veteran's Memorial Hall." Commissioner Fox advised that the sentence on paragraph 3 of page 12 should be mothFed to read as follows: "Commissioner Fox advised that she had spoken with the Greener, Mr_ and Mrs_ Bozorgzad, Kathy Ferreira, and Mr_ Lam h, .Sr., and had contacted the Police Department to hove a patrol offzcer ire the neighborhood survey the planned path at San Carlos Way °--~' "-° -~ °' °rc°°- = ~'~° --°---'-'--~-'--~°-' ' Commissioner Blank advised that the sentence on paragraph 4 of page 1 2 should be modified to read as follows: "Commissioner Blank advised that he had spoken with Mr. and Mrs. Bozorgzad and Mr_ Greene-" The minutes were approved as corrected. 3_ MEETING OPEN FOR ANY MEMBER OF THE AUDIENCE TO ADDRESS THE PLANNING COMMISSION ON ANY ITEM WHICH IS NOT ALREADY ON THE AGENDA_ Vanessa Kawaihu, 871 Sycamore Road, thax~l{ed the Plar~ning Commission for continuing the Greenbrier scoping session. She recalled an editorial letter in the previous day's Valley Times commending the Mayor for bringing up the fiscal impacts of a project during an EIR scoping session. She inquired whether that would be brought up during the scoping session in March and whether residents would be allowed to ask about fiscal impacts. She would like the rules to be delineated. Commissioner Roberts noted that the speaker during the scoping session had been corrected by the attorney_ 4_ REVISIONS AND OMISSIONS TO THE AGENDA Ms. Decker advised that staff had received an e-mail from the applicant's representative requesting that Item 6.c., PUD-OS-1M, Frank and Barbara Berlo mar/Kenneth and Pamela Chrisman, be continued to the next available Planning Commission hearing date_ She noted that the March 23, 2005 meeting has been reserved for the Spotorno Ranch EIR scoping session and that continuing the item to the March 9, 2005 meeting would allow the applicant only a week to work out any issues. Staff requested that the item be continued to the first available April meeting date- Ms_ Nerland defined the rules of a continuance as stated in the Commissioners' Handbook. She noted that this continuance was for the purpose of working issues out among the parties and added that the parties were not in attendance at this meeting. PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES February 23, 2005 Page 2 of 17