Laserfiche WebLink
YLANNINCi C7OMMISSION CITY OF PLEASANTON <br />ALA MEDA COUNTY, C'ALIPORNIA <br />RESOLUTION NO. PC-2005-33 <br />RESOLUTION APPROVING THE APPLICATION OF BRANT AND GINA DAOUST <br />FOR DESIGN REVIEW AYVROVAL, AS PILED iJNDER CASE PDR-466 <br />W tIEREAS, Brant and Gina Daoust have applied for design review approval to construct an <br />approximately 4, 1 00-square-foot single-fan-iily custom hoinc attd for a minor <br />modification Case PUD-OI-8M~ to an approved development plan to modify the <br />development standards to reduce the required 25-foot rear yard setback to 15 feet <br />at 2503 Vineyard Avenue in the Vineyard Avenue Corridor Specific Plan Area- <br />and <br />WHEREAS, zoning for the property is PUD-LDR Planned Unit Development -Low Density <br />Residential) District; and <br />WHEREAS, at its duly noticed public hearing of July 13, 2005, the Planning Commission <br />considered all public testimony, relevant exhibits, and recommendations of the= <br />City staff concerning this application; and <br />WHEREAS, an enviror~iiiental review of the proposed project would be covered by the Initial <br />Study and Negative Declaration approved for this site by the CJ ity Council for <br />PUD-O1 in conformance with the standards of the California Environmental <br />Quality Act ~CEQA~; there arc no substantial changes to the project or to the <br />circumstances under which the project is undertaken that involve new signiFcant <br />environmental effects or that substantially increase the severity of previously <br />identified effects furthermore, there is no new information of substantial <br />importance which was known at the time that the Negative Declaration was <br />approved by the City Council regarding the project or its effects, mitigation <br />measures, ar alternatives; any previously ideniit3ed effects or impacts are <br />ireitigated to a level of insignificance, with the mitigation measures incorporated <br />i»LO the prof ect's design or imposed on the project pursuant to the conditions of <br />approval; acid <br />WHEREAS, the Planning Commission determined that Case PUD-OI-BM should be processed <br />as a minor modification; and <br />WHEREAS, the Planning Commission further detcrnzined that the proposed project is <br />consistent with the appearance of the existing buildings in the area- <br />