My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
SR 06:078
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2006
>
SR 06:078
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/3/2006 9:30:35 AM
Creation date
3/3/2006 9:12:53 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
STAFF REPORTS
DOCUMENT DATE
3/7/2006
DESTRUCT DATE
15 Y
DOCUMENT NO
SR 06:078
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
17
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />correct in that the task force has not met for some time. At the last meeting the task force <br />gave staff direction to go to the City Council with their recommendation that the City <br />Council authorize an RFQ for consultant services to help with the next phase of the <br />development process. There were also funding issues involved. The City Council <br />approved the recommendation and approved funding for that phase of the project. Staff <br />prepared a draft RFQ, sent it to all of the task force members approximately two months <br />ago. Staff has received comments from everyone on the task force. Those comments <br />have been incorporated but not yet circulated. Staff has not moved forward as they have <br />been involved in other projects (for example, the Kottinger Place irrigation project). <br />However, the City recently hired a new intern. One of the intern's priority projects will <br />be to compose a list of qualified firms to receive the RFQ. Mr. Bocian estimates that the <br />RFQ will be ready to send out within two weeks, This will be followed by a 3D-day <br />period for responses. He estimates the task force will be meeting a few weeks after the <br />responses are received. <br /> <br />Chairperson Stark asked for an update on this issue at the next meeting. <br /> <br />7. MATTERS CONTINUED FOR DISCUSSION <br /> <br />[There were none.] <br /> <br />8. PUBLIC HEARINGS AND OTHER MATTERS <br /> <br />A. Recommendation to Approve the Affordable Housing Agreement with <br />Silverstone Communities for a 45-Unit Condominium Development Located at <br />3909 Vineyard Avenue <br /> <br />Steven Bocian presented the staff report. He reported that staff is recommending that the <br />Commission approve the draft Affordable Housing Agreement and recommend that it be <br />approved by the City Council. At its last meeting the Commission reviewed the <br />conceptual design and affordability concepts for the project proposed by Silverstone <br />Communities. The Commission directed staff to draft an Affordable Housing <br />Agreement. The Commission also indicated an interest in trying to incorporate <br />provisions that would discourage or prevent the "affordable by design" units from being <br />bought up by investors and speculators. The Commission also directed staff to review <br />options for increasing density on the project. <br /> <br />Mr. Bocian further reported that staff has developed a draft Affordable Housing <br />Agreement as requested. If the Housing Commission approves this agreement, it will be <br />forward to the City Council when it reviews the PUD. The agreement will be included as <br />a condition of approval of the PUD. He summarized the provisions in the agreement: <br /> <br />. There will be five units for low-income households priced at $205,000 <br />. There will be two units for moderate-income households priced at $310,000 <br /> <br />Page - 3 - <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.