My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
SR 06:052
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2006
>
SR 06:052
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/2/2006 3:51:31 PM
Creation date
2/2/2006 3:39:40 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
STAFF REPORTS
DOCUMENT DATE
2/7/2006
DESTRUCT DATE
15 Y
DOCUMENT NO
SR 06:052
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
68
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />With respect to sale of the credits, Mr. Sweeney noted that they had a $2.5 million <br />investment in the credits. However, if the Planning Commission or City Council objected <br />to the sale of the credits, they would be willing to give it up. He noted that they had 90 <br />days to use the state money. He noted that they had the maximum green building criteria <br />in the design, and that they provided every senior service possible. He added that they <br />reached the maximum affordability rating of 3 5 points. He noted that the loan rates were <br />higher than a conunercial bank, but that it enabled them to receive the affordable housing <br />credits. <br /> <br />Patricia Belding, 7703 Highland Oaks Drive, Chairperson, Citizens for a Caring <br />Conununity, noted that they had supported Ponderosa's senior development. She <br />supported the increased number of affordable units, including those for very low income <br />residents. She suggested that the Commission approve the transfer alone, because it was <br />the continuation of the same project, which she believed was an excellent development. <br />She would like to limit policies which would make it difficult to meet the June, 2004, <br />Housing Element goal, which planned 25% of the remaining building permits to go to <br />low income units. She believed that the Commission may want to consider density <br />reduction at the mid-point or lower for the development of the adjacent property or other <br />property. She would not like to see as many larger homes built, because they do not take <br />up as many housing unit credits; that would leave more units for the needed low-income <br />units. ' <br /> <br />She noted that transfer credits may be granted to occur when the Housing Element goals <br />had occurred. She supported Ponderosa's use of the affordable housing credits, and <br />believed the development was an outstanding addition to Pleasanton. <br /> <br />THE PUBLIC HEARING WAS CLOSED. <br /> <br />In response to an inquiry by Commissioner Sullivan, Mr. Bocian replied that there were <br />five midpoint density units per acre, for a total of 100 units. <br /> <br />Chairperson Arkin strongly supported the project, and the use of the credits in other parts <br />of the conununity. He noted that he was a very strong advocate of affordable senior <br />housing, and added that he would have a problem with high density non-senior housing. <br /> <br />Commissioner Roberts noted that she supported this project, and believed that clustered <br />senior residences was a positive idea. She liked the applicant's use of affordable housing <br />credits, and believed that the City Council should be allowed to make this decision. She <br />noted that Ms. Belding's suggestions may be heard by City Council when the credits <br />were to be transferred. She believed that there would be a problem with the transfer of <br />money, but believed that City Council should be given the flexibility to decide what <br />should be done with the credits. She noted that it would be too expensive to build <br />affordable housing in the hills, and that the grading requirements would not be feasible <br />for that use. <br /> <br />PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES <br /> <br />July 9,2003 EXCERPTS <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.