Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> <br />ATTACHMENT 11 -..- <br />T.'VT-TI1P'IT J <br />~ -;.. ,{-ti .< .,l"f:}.. , <br />fi;, ' , ,/, 0:" ii",. ,!L.. '" )dt,.i.\" ~ c.; <br /> <br />pLEASANTONc <br />MEMORANDUM <br /> <br />Date: <br /> <br />July 13, 2005 <br /> <br />To: <br /> <br />Planning Commissioners <br /> <br />From: <br /> <br />Rosalind Rondash, Assistant Planner <br /> <br />Subject: <br /> <br />PUD-8, Thuse Large Family Daycare <br /> <br />Honorable Commissioners, <br /> <br />Back!!round <br /> <br />Subsequent to the June 22nd Planning Commission hearing, Staff was provided with a number of <br />inquiries related to the conditions of approval presented to the applicant in order for staff to <br />support the project. For reasons of due diligence, staff requested the June 22nd hearing to be <br />continued to allow time to analyze those inquires. <br /> <br />In an e-mail dated June 22nd, Commissioner Fox specifically requested that staff contact the <br />Child Care Law Center to obtain their perspective of how local governments impose restrictions <br />on large family daycare facilities. Staff also contacted Child Care Links regarding the same <br />topic. <br /> <br />Child Care Law Center <br /> <br />On June 30th, 2005 staff spoke with Ed Bolen of the Child Care Law Center. Mr. Bolen <br />provided supporting insight and comments for staffs approach to the review oflarge family <br />daycares in a general context. Mr. Bolen also confirmed that he concurs with and has seen <br />where other jurisdictions have conditioned a specific location for loading and unloading of <br />children as long as it is grounded in the four areas identified by State Law: 1) traffic 2) safety 3) <br />noise and 4) concentration. He also provided a hypothetical example of requiring the use of a <br />driveway for drop-off and pick-up as being legally acceptable as long as it is for traffic and/or <br />safety reasons. <br /> <br />PDUP-8, Thuse Large Family Daycare <br />I <br />