My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
SR 06:033
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2006
>
SR 06:033
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/2/2006 3:48:58 PM
Creation date
2/2/2006 3:35:49 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
STAFF REPORTS
DOCUMENT DATE
2/7/2006
DESTRUCT DATE
15 Y
DOCUMENT NO
SR 06:033
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
137
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />Ms. Decker noted that it had been an oversight to not include them in the conditions and that <br />they could be added. <br /> <br />In response to an inquiry by Commissioner Pearce regarding use of the common facilities, <br />Ms. Nerland advised that State law specifically states that the HOA may not prohibit large family <br />daycare uses. There was also language about liability insurance. There was no specific <br />reference in the State law with respect to use and regulations ofthe facilities. If the HOA <br />believes it has the legal authority to limit those or the number of guests a resident may bring to <br />the facilities, they may explore that option. She noted that was out of the City's purview. <br /> <br />Commissioner Arkin did not believe that the 60-70 decibel limit would be exceeded and added <br />that the applicant indicated that the daycare would have infants and preschool children. <br /> <br />Commissioner Fox moved to make the required conditional use permit findings as listed in <br />the staff report and to approve PDUP-8, subject to the conditions of approval listed in <br />Exhibit B as recommended by staff, with the following modifications that parents dropping <br />their children off at the day care must turn their car engines off and not blow their horns <br />and that the word "prohibited" be replaced by the word "discouraged" with respect to <br />clients using the curb for parking. <br /> <br />Chairperson Maas requested an amendmeut that staff review the daycare operation <br />45 days after the use permit approval. <br /> <br />Commissioner Fox accepted the amendment. <br />Chairperson Maas seconded the motion. <br /> <br />Commissioner Roberts requested some information on issues surrounding backing out of the <br />driveway. <br /> <br />Commissioner Arkin noted that he did not support the motion as stated. He noted that this was a <br />high-density neighborhood and believed that most drivers would make U-turns rather than drive <br />through the entire neighborhood loop. He believed this was an inappropriate use for this <br />neighborhood. <br /> <br />Chairperson Maas expressed concern regarding private streets and enforcement oflaw within <br />such a development. She suggested continuing this item in order to get more information about <br />that issue. <br /> <br />Ms. Nerland noted that City generally does not enforce traffic violations on private streets; <br />however, these violations could be enforced if they violate the conditions of the use permit. <br /> <br />Commissioner Arkin expressed concern that this use would be allowable in perpetuity on this <br />high-density neighborhood. <br /> <br />Ms. Decker noted that the conditions must be met in order for the use to be continued. <br /> <br />Commissioner Arkin noted that he had rarely, if ever, seen a conditional use permit revoked. <br />Ms. Decker noted that it was easier to grant a conditional use permit than revoke it. <br /> <br />EXCERPTS: PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES, July 13,2005 <br /> <br />Page 5 of6 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.