Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Martin Patrick, 5044 Carducci Drive, spoke in opposition to this item. He expressed concern <br />about traffic safety on the narrow street. He noted that these private streets were zoned for <br />15 mph and were maintained by the residents, as were the facilities. He objected to the residents <br />in the development being asked to supplement this business and added that they expected to have <br />peace and quiet in their neighborhood. He noted that people living in the development did not <br />expect to live next door to a business and expressed concern about property values of homes next <br />to daycare businesses. <br /> <br />Ashish Goel, 5216 Genovesio Drive, spoke inopposition to this item. He expressed concern <br />about traffic safety, especially when parents are running late on the way to work. He noted that <br />cars parked on both sides of the narrow street created a traffic and safety issue. He believed <br />there would be a noise issue as well. <br /> <br />Joe McGovern, 5074 Carducci Drive, spoke in opposition to this item and expressed concern <br />about the use of open space and the swimming pool in the common areas. He inquired how <br />many vehicles were owned by the applicants and whether the garage was part of this facility. He <br />was concerned about the language holding the homeowners association harmless, given the <br />litigious nature of society. <br /> <br />Ms. Decker was unsure how many vehicles were owned by the applicants and noted that they <br />sent an e-mail stating that there were three vehicles. She noted that under Condition No. 11, any <br />daycare employees must use the garage or onstreet parking in front of the residence to mitigate <br />use of the driveway. <br /> <br />Ms. Decker noted that the "hold harmless" clause was part of the State's requirements. <br /> <br />Ms. Nerland advised that State law pre-empted the City in this regard, stating that HOAs may not <br />prohibit this use; however, if the Homeowners Association (HOA) requests to be named as an <br />additional insured, that may be done. <br /> <br />Brenda Patrick, 5044 Carducci Drive, spoke in opposition to this item and expressed concern <br />about the small front lawn which would become very crowded with 14 children. She noted that <br />the playground and pool were private and part of the HOA's common grounds. She inquired <br />whether there was a limit to the insurance rates to be set by the HOA. <br /> <br />Ms. Nerland noted that the liability insurance limit appeared to be set $300,000. <br /> <br />Leanea Li, 5285 Genovesio Drive, spoke in opposition to this item and expressed concern that <br />other large daycare applications that are being prepared within this 300-foot radius would not be <br />able to be considered. She expressed concern about reckless drivers and that the daycare parents <br />may not drive in a safe manner for the neighborhood. <br /> <br />Commissioner Roberts noted that they must be 300 feet away and that applications are examined <br />on a first-come, first-served basis. <br /> <br />Imelda Doty, 5073 Rigatti Circle, spoke in opposition to this item and noted that when she <br />bought her home, she was not aware that there would be a business in this development. She <br /> <br />EXCERPTS: PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES, July 13,2005 <br /> <br />Page 3 of6 <br />