Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> <br />);,10,..// ..y i, <br /> <br />COMPREHENSIVE EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT PLAN <br /> <br />Drought <br /> <br />Drought, though a potential problem in the City, is not fully assessed. The City will work <br />with ABAG and various water supply agencies on this issue. <br /> <br />The City plans to work with ABAG to develop specific information about the kind and level <br />of damage to buildings, infrastructure, and critical facilities which might result from any of <br />the hazards previously noted. The ABAG Annex states that ABAG will be doing this work <br />in 2005 through early 2006. <br /> <br />As these impacts are not fully developed, the City and School District have reviewed the <br />hazards identified and ranked the hazards based on past disasters and expected future <br />impacts. The conclusion is that earthquakes (particularly shaking), hazardous material <br />spill, flooding, wildfire, and landslides (including unstable earth) pose a significant risk for <br />potential loss in the City of Pleasanton. <br /> <br />Earthquakes (particularly shaking and earthquake liquefaction), the wildland-urban <br />interface fire threat, hazardous material spills and dam inundation pose a significant risk to <br />Pleasanton Unified School District. In addition, 5 schools are in the 500 year flood plain <br />with none in the 100 year flood plain. <br /> <br />Mitigation Priorities <br /> <br />As a participant in the ABAG multi-jurisdictional planning process, City of Pleasanton staff <br />helped in the development and review of the comprehensive list of mitigation strategies in <br />the overall multi-jurisdictional plan. The list was discussed at the meetings discussed <br />above on February 14th and March 22nd, 2005. At the meeting, all of the mitigation <br />strategies were reviewed. The tentative decision on priority was made based on a variety <br />of criteria, not simply on an economic cost-benefit analysis. These criteria include being <br />technically and administratively feasible, politically acceptable, socially appropriate, legal, <br />economically sound, and not harmful to the environment or our heritage. <br /> <br />Over time, we are committed to developing better hazard and risk information to use in <br />making those trad~ffs. We are not trying to create a disaster-proof region, but a <br />disaster-resistant one. In addition, several of the strategies are existing City programs. <br /> <br />Pleasanton Unified School District also helped in the development and review of mitigation <br />strategies. They discussed the priorities in the group meetings on February 23 and March <br />22, 2005 as well as in follow-up meetings, calls and emails with Livermore-Pleasanton Fire <br />Department. All school buildings have been either constructed or modernized between <br />1991 to the present, with the majority being modernized or built in the last five years. Two <br />schools are currently under construction, and the district office (a wood frame building) <br />was modernized in 1987. Donlon School is the only school still being retrofitted. All <br />school facilities are in full compliance with the Department of the State Architect. <br /> <br />These draft priorities were submitted to the Fire Chief for review and approval. (The <br />Livermore-Pleasanton Fire Department is the agency which is charged with disaster <br />preparedness in the City of Pleasanton.) After FEMA approves the multi-jurisdictional <br />plan, Pleasanton will place on the City's website the mitigation plan for further public input <br /> <br />ANNEX G - Local Hazard Mitigation Annex <br />Updated 12112105 <br /> <br />9 <br />