My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
RES 05086
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
RESOLUTIONS
>
2000-2009
>
2005
>
RES 05086
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/3/2007 3:57:29 PM
Creation date
12/22/2005 2:40:26 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
RESOLUTIONS
DOCUMENT DATE
11/15/2005
DOCUMENT NO
RES 05 086
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
10
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br /> <br />CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PLEASANTON <br /> <br />ALAMEDA COUNTY. ALAMEDA <br /> <br />RESOLUTION NO. 05-086 <br /> <br />RESOLUTION DENYING THE APPEAL OF CASE PAP-88, THEREBY <br />UPHOLDING THE APPROVAL OF THE APPLICATION OF DAVID <br />QUARTAROLI FOR DESIGN REVIEW APPROVAL, AS FILED UNDER <br />CASE PDR-482 <br /> <br />WHEREAS. David Quartaroli applied for design revievv approval to construct a <br />6.785-square-foot. tvvo-story custom home vvith a 992-square-foot garage. <br />for a total of 7.777 square feet. at 5210 Clubhouse Drive (Lot 11 of <br />Tract 7372. Mariposa Ranch; and <br /> <br />WHEREAS. zoning for the property is PUD-LDR (Planned Unit Development - Lovv <br />Density Residential) District; and <br /> <br />WHEREAS. at its meeting of October 19. 2005. the Planning Commission. after having <br />considered all public testimony. relevant exhibits. and recommendations of <br />City staff conceming this application. approved the application; and <br /> <br />WHEREAS. vvithin the time specified by the Pleasanton Municipal Code. the applicant <br />and appellant. Jerry Wagner. submitted an appeal to the decision of the <br />Planning Commission; and <br /> <br />WHEREAS. at its meeting of November 15.2004. the City Council received a report <br />from the Director of Planning and Community Development. together vvith <br />a copy of the staff report to the Planning Commission. regarding this <br />matter; and <br /> <br />WHEREAS. the City Council held a public hearing on November 15.2005. at vvhich <br />time the applicant. the appellant and other members of the public presented <br />evidence regarding this appeal; and <br /> <br />WHEREAS. after a revievv of the materials presented. the City Council determined that <br />the proposed design revievv. as conditioned. is appropriate and is consistent <br />vvith the zoning regulations for the zoning district of the property. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.