PC 121003 - Laserfiche WebLink

Pl"1il G-rubstick advised that the tra:f:t1c impact fee vv-as calculat.ed based on a formula irH:~luded iJ."1 the 1:raTfic impact fee report:. He did not kno"V'V ""'-'"hat the Tee vvould be for this project. The money VV"ould be set aside in a fund and vv-ould pay for projects identi:tled in that: report. As the projects VV"ere brought into the capital improvement program" the fee vv-ould pay for the project. He noted tl"1at several di:tTerent rates may apply", and he "",-,"as UI""1Su-re vvl"1ether the tra:t:fic engineer had perrorn""l.ed tl"lat analysis. COU"'lmissioner Roberts inquired about tl""l.e justification For adding $100,,000 for another class of service. Chairperson ArkiJ.""1 believed there VV"as a question 01:- equity and noted that t.he public should be avv-are of ho"V'V the fee vv-as derived. 1'V'1r. Kierstead advised that the packet: included 346 signatures in. favor of this project a..nd another 35 signatu-res had been received fa-voring the project. He noted that he took l""1is community responsibility seriously and added that the unsol-ved questions "V'Vould be solved in the first year. He intended to form a committee vvhich included people "V'Vho "",-,"ere opposed to the project to address these questions. He not.ed that they VV"ould be open :for I 10 days", not: four months" a..nd vv-ould be open for special student groups. He noted that these groups VV"ou-ld normally arri-vc by bus betvveen the hours o:t- 10:00 a.m. and 3 :00 p.m. He did not belic-ve that vvould cause any traffic impact:. He noted that the study shoVV"ed 3.6 cars", vvhich. VV"as a lovver impact in the arca than tl""l.e Park Dist.rict"'s calculatior1 of 4. 1 cars. l'v1s. KnutsOI""l. noted that CalTrans had i1110rmed tl"1el"Tl that the project vvould qualify for special signage on 1-580 and 1-680 and that they vv-ished to "",-,"ork vvith t.he City for the exact. vv-ording. She t.hen noted that tl""l.e fence line shoVV"n in the pictures along Stanley l3oule-vard "V'Vas the existing fencing. Sl1e i""urt.her noted that there vvas 110 plan to cl""l.aJ.""l.ge the fence because their property liJ.""l.e starts on the i1""l.side or tl"1e :fence and that tl""l.ere "V'Vou.ld be a second fence. 1'V'1s. K..n.u.tson ad-vised that they vv-ould not be selling alcohoL She noted that. any applications for privat.e parties VV"hich included beer or VV"ine must go through the Police Department for a permit. She also noted that. one section oythe children"s pool V'v'as up to tvv"o feet deep a..nd had a play structure vv-ith dump bu.ckets and a smaller "",-,"ater cannorL ~[~he southermI1ost section ""'-'"as a lovv-impact pool that vvou.ld be mOTe appropriate ror parents vv-ith toddlers. l.V1:r. :ECierstead noted that they vvere very interested in the PV panels", bll-t "",-,"as "\.-l..nsure vvhether they VV"ou-ld be installed ill the first. year. He emphasized t.hat. they V'v'ere in their long-range plans and vv-ould come in before the additional features. He had not been avvare of the photocell panels for the pumps and vvas not sure vvhether they vvould be practical :for the very large pu.mps. He vvould ask tl""1cir aqu.at:ic engin.eer to pro-vidc tl""1e ITlOSt efficient pumps possible a1""l.d to make it. as e1"1ergy efficient as possible. He noted that their current energy bill vvas $30",000 per year" and that vv-ould be ir1crease five-fold PLANNING COlVllVlISSION l'VlINUTES Decen,ber 10, 2003 Page 19 ......_--r