My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
PC 121003
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
MINUTES
>
2000-2009
>
2003
>
PC 121003
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/14/2017 9:42:49 AM
Creation date
12/8/2005 10:26:27 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
12/10/2003
DOCUMENT NAME
PC-121003
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
31
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />In response to an inquiry by Commissioner Sullivan", :rv1:r. Boedecker replied tl""1at he had <br />convinced lVlr. Kierstead to use solar panels. He noted t11at the seasonal nature of the <br />vvater park made it aJ:1 ideal ca..ndidate for solar povv-er. He added that the solar povv-er <br />vv-ould co-ver approximately 20 percent of his electrical consumption", "V'Vhich is vv-orth <br />3 LEEDTlVI points. <br /> <br />Commissioner SullivaJ:1 suggested that PV pa..nels be used as vv-elL <br /> <br />l'V1r. Boedecker thanked Commissioner Sullivan for that suggestion. He noted that he had <br />a letter f-rom l.V1:akita Solar VrVhich stated the LEEDTIVI points" as vv-ell as a letter from tl""1e <br />LJ.S. Green. Building Council detailing the LEEDTl\tf points. <br /> <br />JOaJ:1ie Fields", 4053 'lValnut Drive", subn"'1itted a speal<.er slip", b1.-1-t vv-as 1"'10t i1""1 attenda1"1ce to <br />speak. <br /> <br />~eely Parrack", 186 ~rrenton Circle" expressed concern about the incoming .lkea a..nd the <br />neVrV city center bet"VVeen Tass8..;jara Road aJ:1d Airport Boulevard in Dublin.. She noted that <br />vv-ould create a lot of extra tra:fI1c in the future" vvl"'1ich vvauld impact Pleasanton. She did <br />not see a solution to the Valley and Bernal Avenues question and noted that: it "V'Vas stuck <br />at a Level-of-Ser-vice E. She not:ed that Phase I vvould be at 75 percent level of <br />completion. and vvas concemed about t.he revievv- process. <br /> <br />C':ommissioner Roberts not.ed that: it vv-ould be a public hearing. <br /> <br />:rv1:s. Parrack inquired about the proposed crime figure increases", parking problems" and <br />reduction of house values. <br /> <br />Chairperson .Arkin noted that tl""1ere vvas no qUa.r:Ltitati-ve analysis al.""1d that a qualitati-vc <br />process vv-ould be invol-ved to make the decision. <br /> <br />1'v1:s_ Parrack i1""1quired vvhether there vvould be a discount for Pleasanton reside1"'1ts and did <br />1"10t believe the entra.r:Lce fees vv-ere affordable. SI"'1e had tl""1ought that heritage trees should <br />be protected and did not believe that they should be ren....oved because a fee vvas paid. She <br />expressed concern about the saf:ety of-~the vvildlife habitat. <br /> <br />In response to an. inquiry by Commissioner Roberts", l'v1r. Iserson confirmed that the <br />traffic report included the present expansion ortl"1e Valley Avenue-Bernal Avenue- <br />Stanley Boulevard intersection. He noted that one report examined the Ponderosa <br />project", "V'Vhich u-sed the trarfic model" and used the mitigations it VrVas required to build. <br />He conf1rmed that those items vv-ere accounted for", and t:hat "V'Vith the Ponderosa <br />mitigations", the tratnc Level-of-Service vvauld be D. <br /> <br />Con""1missioner Fox noted that online revieVrVs of VrVater parks often mentioned the smell <br />th.at vv-as generated "V'Vhen the VrVater VrVas not changed of:1:en enough~ She vvould like a <br />condition to be added vv-hich required that there be no noticeable odor in the attractions. <br /> <br />PLANNING COl'Vll'VlISSION l'VlINUTES December 10,2003 <br /> <br />Page 16 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.