PC 111203 - Laserfiche WebLink

Commissioner Roberts belieV"ed that the applicant "'-'"o"U-Id be agreeable to that requ-est. Commissioner Sullivan noted that any noise or parking problem may be referred to' the Planning Director or the Commission. Commissioner S....llivan moved .0 approve PCUP-97 as condi.ioned in "he s"aCC report:., a:n.d s....bjec't 'to 'the co:n.di'tions lis"'t:ed in Exhibi"t: 8. Co-n.di'tion 5 """"o....ld be modified. 'to, read, "The applican..s are s.rongly enco....raged 'to res.ripe -the 10. as so un as possible.'" Commissio:n.er .K.ameny seco:n.ded .he mo1:ioIl.. ~OLL CALL VOTE AYES: NOES: ABSTAIN: ABSENT: Commissioners Arkin." Ka.rn.eny" l\I1aas." Roberts, and S"U-Ili-van None. None. None. Resolution No. PC-2003-49 vv-as entered and adopted as motioned. b_ PCUP-99. JOI1 BussaI1i Application for conditional "U-se permit appro-val to operate a personal training facility in an. existin.g buildin.g in the ~orth Creek I office complex located at 7068 Koll Center Park'Nay, Suite 415_ Zon.ing for the property is PUD-I/C-O (Plan.ned Unit Development - Industrial/Commercial-Office) District. J'v1:r. Iserson. presen.ted the staff report. He described the site and operating hou.rs of the u.se, and noted that: due to the individu.al nature of the training, no more than six people VV"ould be in the facility at anyone time. Sta:fT belie-ved that the land use VV"ould be compatible VV"ith and su.pportive of the other uses in the business center_ The nearest residences VV"ere located approximately 260 feet from thc facility, across an arroyo vvith landscaping and a berm. Staff believed there vv-as a su.fficient buffer betVV"een the facility and the residential area. Staff believed that the early moming clients VV"ould be best advised to u.se the parking in the fron.t of t.he b-uildin.g", ",,"hich "V\Tas farther a"V\Tay from the residen.tial neighborhood. HoVV"e-ver , because of t:he small number of clients expected at anyone time, staff believed that the applicant should not be requ-ired to use that parking scheme and that the situation may be reassessed if a noise problem arose. There V\Tere no noisy activities of any consequences, and a parking study shoVV"ed that there VV"ere surplus parking spaces on-site_ Staff noticed everyone ",,"ithin 1,000 feet of this use, a..nd did not recei-ved any respon.se. Staff believed the use vv-ould be a positive addition to the neighborhood, VV"ould be compatible vvith the surrormding neighborhood, and vv-ould offer a service to the commrmity. Staff recommended approval of this use su-bject to the conditions of the staff report. PLA~ING COl'Vll'VlISSION l'VlINUTES Nov-ember 12,2003 Page 8