Laserfiche WebLink
<br />lnndscaping. He noted that the building "V'Vould be scaled do'VVT1" a.n.d added 'that the site <br />"V\Tas -very challenging. <br /> <br />TI-IE PUBLIC I-IEARING ~ AS CLOSED. <br /> <br />No action VV'as taken. <br /> <br />7_ <br /> <br />1VI:A TTERS INITIATED BY C01Vl:1VI:ISSION 1VI:E1VI:BERS <br /> <br />Commissioner J'\I.[aas noted that vvith respect to the information on ,^-,"almart in. the packet" <br />an. article ir:L the Independent" quoted Conncilmember Hosterman. regarding a possible <br />ex.pnnsion. She inquired "V'Vhether the retail use included a grocery store. <br /> <br />l\.Ilr. Iserson noted that: vvas a key question" nnd ad-vised that Cormcilmember Hostermnn <br />appealed the design re-vieVV" approval for the condensing rmi-t. in the back_ He noted that <br />-t.here vvould be a staff report: that "V'Vould address the use. It: vvas s-t.aff"s opinion that the <br />grocery operation. "V\Tas nn nncillary use to their approved use_ Staff un.derstood that the <br />City may vvish to in.itiate a pun modifica-t.ion to regulate the grocery use. He noted that <br />"VValmart vvas not using its alloVV"ed ex:pnnsion to accommoda-t.e the grocery use; rather" the <br />use VV'ould be contained "V'Vi-t.hin. the ex.isting confines of the store. <br /> <br />Commissioner Sullivnn noted that he had also left a voicemail forI.V1:s. Nerland VV'ith <br />respect to the grocery use. He "V\Tould like an. analysis on the grocery use as it relates to <br />,^-,"almart"'s usual opera-t.ion. He requested s-t.aff"'s opinion of his V\fTitten nnalysis of grocery <br />sales by big box s-t.ores_ <br /> <br />Commissioner I'V1:aas noted that grocery sales did not generate -t.ax revenue" and -t.hat the <br />traffic and other impacts to the City vv-ould not be mi-t.iga-t.ed by additional re-venue_ <br /> <br />Commissioner Fox: requested tha-t. staff prepare a lis-t. or pros and cons VV"i-t.h respect to a <br />big box ordinance in Pleasanton. She noted that issue had not been raised at the Chamber <br />of Commerce meetings. <br /> <br />Commissioner Sullivan ad-vised that issue V\Tas discussed at the General Plan meetings. <br /> <br />Ce>mmissie>:ner ~a..a.s ce>r:l.cu.rred ""ith Ce>mmissior:ter Fe>x" s requ.est fe>r a. sta.ff repe>rt: Or:L the <br />big box: question. <br /> <br />l'VlL Iserson recalled the City Council's opinion that the General Plan study vvas the best <br />context ror ex:amining this issue. <br /> <br />Commissioner 1'rv1aas requested a presentation of the different traffic directions for patron.s <br />vv-hen the Califomia Spla.sh application came before the Commission. <br /> <br />Commissioner Roberts noted that the Commission. vv-anted to hear the Califomia Splash <br />application after the model". vv-hich has not been forthcoming. <br /> <br />PLANNING COl'Vll'VlISSION l'VlINlJTES ~oV'ember 12, 2003 <br /> <br />Page 15 <br />