Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Commissio..er .Robert.-s moved t.-o co...sider... "",he... t.-he parcel "",hich "",ill be t:he school <br />or se...ior housi...g is brought.- Co.-,.vard., a t.-rail co.....ect.-i...g t.-Ol t:he lVIart.-in Avenue Trail <br />tOl Busch R..Olad t.-lO be a separat.-e t.-rail t.-hat.- is IIlOt.- part.- lO:t~ a rOlad and nOlt.- a side-vvalk. <br />Commissio...er lVTaas seconded .-he mo.-ion. <br /> <br />ROLL CALL "V"OTE <br /> <br />AYES: <br />NOES: <br />ABSTATN: <br />ABSENT: <br /> <br />Commissioners ~rkin." 1<-amel'1Y,. 1V1.aas,. Roberts." al"1d Sullivan. <br />None. <br />~one. <br />None_ <br /> <br />The motion carried. <br /> <br />Par:n Hardy no"ted "that the property vvhich vvould be 1...1.ltimately developed by "the School <br />District vvoulct come back to the City for the ""rrai1 l~lan. She l'1oted tl'1at during the series <br />of public vvorkshops." the community stated very clearly that they did not vvant a vvalkvvay <br />connecting to the school" and it vvas not incl1...1.ded in tl,eir plans. She noted that if the <br />project site vvas ultin1ately constructed vvith sCl'1ior housing,. Ponderosa vvould vvork vvith <br />tl-:te City vvith respect to that issue. She noted that portions o-rthat right-of-vvay vvould be <br />absorbed int.o the project site,. vvith t11e rernaining halr- going to Zone 7 as t11e 1...u1derlying <br />original property ovvner. <br /> <br />7. <br /> <br />lVTATTERS INITIATED BY C<>lVTlVTISSION lVIElVIBERS <br /> <br />Chairperson Arkin noted that the Planning Commissio1""l. requested that statT present a <br />S1...1-n"1mary report on AB 1 160." so that the Comrnission may take a formal act.ion in the <br />ruture in opposition to this bilL <br /> <br />!\r1s. Nerlnnd advised that tl1is ite1-n. may be -torn""l.ally agendized -tor a future ITleetil-:tg,. and <br />1-n.ay be brought to tl"1e City Council"s attention from the City "M"anager"s officc. Sl1c <br />described AB 1160 as an extension ot- SB 1 866., vvhich vvas tl""l.c i1-n.petus .for alT'lendil'1g the <br />Second Unit Ordinance earlier this year_ She noted that AB 1160 states that the standards <br />for secol'1d units must be objective and as cost-neu"tral as possible and that it. attempts to <br />put lin"1its 011 tl1e standards., such as: <br /> <br />1 _ Ovvncr occupat-ion of-- one of--1:he 1...1.ni1:.s may rUJ ICH"1ger be required; <br />2. Only limited parking requircrncnts arc allovved" and on-street parking is <br />counted tovvards n1ceting the parking requ.irernent; and <br />4_ The potential FAR Tor a second unit vvould be il"1creased_ <br /> <br />JVIs. Nerland added that the bill vvould require that any sites zoned tor schools must allovv <br />single- or r11ulti-fm-n.ily l'101...1.sing as a pern~itted use_ She noted that. this vvas particularly <br />odd for Pleasanton because any site zoned Public and I1-:tstitutional,. '\.Vhich vvould include <br />school sites., requires a Conditional Use Permit and that ZOnil""l.g does not allovv residential <br />1...1.ses. <br /> <br />PLA~ING COJVIJVIISSION JVIINUTES <br /> <br />October 8, 2003 <br /> <br />Page 10 <br />