PC 092403 - Laserfiche WebLink

lV'lanagement Group could not represent the ovvner_ 11'1 addition., the n"1aintenance association had no legal right to represent homeovvners in aI1y vvay", nor can a Bridle Creek homeovvner vvho is a represelltative to that group represelTt: tl""l.el"11. He .l-:tot..ed "that. "this vvas a diFrerent situation tl"'lan Kottingcr" and believed that tl""1C IT1ail'1tcnal""l.Ce association vvas poVV"erless except. :tor ellsUTing that landscaping vvas maintained. l'v'fr. I'V'lahdavi VV"as concerned about damage to land and vievvs" especially 50 vertical cuts il""1 the hillsides a.r1d the removal of218 heritage trees from the property_ He .noted t:l'1at 70 out of 1 1 I homes -vvere directly in the patl-:t of" cars cornin.g th.roLlgh tl-:te developn'1ent_ He l'1oted that an additional 2,.000 cars per day vovould pass t.hrough due to tl'1e golf course.., Nevov Cities", and Spotor.l-:to. He expressed COI'1Cern about l-:lis cl-:tildrel-:t"'s safety" as vvell as the 300 childrel-:l in. the in""l.rnediate COll""l.I-:lT\..U""l.it:y. He l'1oted that h..e read tl-:trough every document prior to his closing" and he vvas avvare of a bypass road to the golf course,. Spotorno,. and ~e-vv Cities,. but did not see anything about L..und Ral-:tch II in the disclosure. lIe believed t:he residents vvere deliberately deceived vvith respect to tl""1e disclosures about Lund Ranch 11_ Theresa and Dan Dilger,. 5213 II""l.dependence Drive,. sublT1itted a speaker slip but vvas 1'10t in atte1-:tdance to speak. _TalT'leS Frost" 5752 I.-lidden Creek Court.., inquired hoVV" the heritage tree ren""loval vvould be mitigated_ He objected 1:0 the removal of 100-year-old oak trees that. could not be replaced vvithin a liFetime_ He believed that the disclosures vvere deceptive,. al"1d that tl"1e verbal statements dif1:ered from the "VVritten declarations. He believed that litigatiol'1 vvas likely because of those disparities_ Bob G-otelJi" 900 Sunset Creek Lane" noted that he lives 500 :feet :fi-orn the eastern bOUI-:ldary o:t- Bridle Creek. He noted tl"1at l"1e l"1ad never been told tl"1at 150 l""l.ouses vvould be built at tl"'le LU.l-:td R.anch property_ He noted that the neighborhood streets -vvere narrovov,. and that the resulting noise and pollutiol""l. vvould be excessive. He believed tl-:te project vvould ruin tl'1e integrity of the Bridle C:reek. COn'11T1unity. Greg Q"Coru"1or. 5750 Hidden Creek Court., echoed tl"'le con'1n'1ents oftl'1e other spcakers.., and noted that l,e had not seen tl'1is development il'1cluded in the disclosure_ I.-Ie had contacted 55 residents on short notice" and only tvvo of- them acknovvledged tl'1at tl'1ey K.l-:te-vv about. LUl-:td Ranch 11_ I--1e n.oted tl""l.at botl""l. of-those people vvorked vvitl-:t GreeI"'lbriar_ He believed tl"1at i:t- Greenbriar IT1ade aJ.'1 error il'1 tl"1e disclosure dOCl.1T1"1Cnt,., or i:t- tl"1C disclosure vvas buried in the closing papervvork,. no one it-:l t11e sales ofIlce vvas a'\Nare or the project. He opposed t.l-:tis projcct., and did not believc tl"1at incomplctc disclosures should be revvarded vvith approval o:t--tl"1is project_ :I-Ie believed tl"1at alterI"1ative traf-r1c routes through Bridle Creek must be explored ir this project vvere to go lor-vvard. He hoped t:hat the City held the llL1-mber of houses to the original 82 l.1-nits,., and did not V\Tish to see excessive excavation in tl"1e development. He invited the COll'1missiol'1erS to visit tl'1e site" and to see hovv narrovv most of the streets vverc. He noted that Sycamore Creek Lane already l-:tad a problcrn vvith speeding" al""l.d tl"1at problel"1"1 "VVould spread to the srrlallcr streets_ PLANNING CC>lVIlVIISSIC>N lVIIN~TrES September 24, 2003 Page 1 5