Laserfiche WebLink
<br />2. Energy efficiency" vvhich saves money for the homeovvner and is returned <br />to the comrn.nnity"s economy:; <br />3_ Air quality and health, "\Mhich "\Mould in-,prove the health oYthe children by <br />reducing untested chemicals" sil""l.gly and in combination. Tl"1ose chemicals <br />vvould be eliminated from the home in the first place. <br /> <br />l"V1:r. _Tohnston l""1oted that the guidelines had 14 sections vvhich follovved the constructi01-:t <br />process" making it easy for an architect or builder to t.rack. It vvas proposed that 50 out of <br />357 available points be used as a baseline measure of green standards", and that each <br />cOIT1munity may cl'1oose a different baselil"1e. Fifty points vvas considered to be 1T1oderately <br />green" and vvas a good el""1try level and improvement over the previous convention of- 25 to <br />30 points_ Projects obtaining 60 points or rnore are considered to have attained a gold <br />level status. <br /> <br />In response to an inquiry by Chairperson Arkin,. lVlr_ Johnston noted tl"1at a hOIT1C ITl-ay be <br />modeled based on its energy components" as defined by the Title XXIV analysis_ He <br />noted that E1""1ergyStar is 1 So/a more efficient vvith respect to operating costs thal""l. Title <br />XXIV. He noted that tl""l.cy determine the energy savin..gs on a montl,ly basis,. rather than <br />tl'1e life of the component_ <br /> <br />In response to an inquiry by Chairperson Arkin". Commissioner Sullivan conl"irn"1cd that a <br />computer model could be developed vvhich vvould calculate the energy costs 01 running <br />the house. <br /> <br />1"v1.r. Johr1ston noted that many chemicals used in standard construction have a significant <br />impact on young children" especially those vvho do not have fully developed itT'ln"1une <br />systems. He noted that the EPA has not kept up vvith the rate of innovation of building <br />products tl'1at incorporate synthetic chemicals. He noted that the test :tor forn'1aldehyde <br />costs approximately $1 ",500 per unit. <br /> <br />l\.I:lr. Jol""l.r1ston noted that the building vvas covered frorn the site througl"1 the f"inishes and <br />flooring. He added that other green building 1'1'1eaSures included on-site IT1aterial <br />recycling". permeable concrete to replenish the vvater table" zeroscape", and lovv vvater <br />native planting. Specific points vvere developed for each ite1T'l for the use of building <br />inspectors and building departments. He displayed a diagram of lovver-percentagc lumber <br />l"1omes that are equally structurally strong as conventional homes". bu.t more el'1ergy <br />e::f:t""icicnt_ <br /> <br />In response to an inquiry by Commissioner Roberts, ML Johnston noted that all-steel <br />framing vvas a highly energy conductive IT1aterial" a..n.d that such homes gain 81""l.d lose heat <br />dramatically a.r1d render the insu.1ation half as efTective as a vvood bLdldil"1g. He noted tl-:tat <br />solar photovoltaics are best installed at the beginning ot- construction, and that the <br />California Energy C.ommission rebates vvere very favorable at this time. He noted that <br />energy bills may be redu.ced by 20-400/10 vvhen tl"1e house is properly angled on the 101. <br /> <br />PLANNING COl'v'I1VlISSION l'v'IINUTES September 10, 2003 <br /> <br />Page 8 <br /> <br />. r. T <br /> <br />T-"-'~ <br />