PC 091003 - Laserfiche WebLink

There vvere no speakers. TFIE ]>UBLIC FIEARING VVAS CLOSED. COommissiOoner lVIaas mOoved t:00 apprOove PC-':"JP-93 as cOondit:iOoned in t:he st:a...... repOort:. COommissiOoner I<.ameny secOonded t:he motio.I. ~<>LL CALL VOTE AYES: NOES: ABST AIN: ABSENT: Commissioners Arkin" Kameny" l'v1aas" Roberts" ar"ld Sullivan NOI"""le None None Resolution No_ PC-2003-38 V\Tas entered and adopted as motioned. c. I:-CUP-92.. IVt:ari K.ennard ~pplication for conditional use permit approval to serve beer" V\Tine", and spIrIts after] 0:00 p.m. (\.-Lntil 1 :00 a.m." lVlonday through Saturday" a.r1d until lV1idnight on Sundays) for The Crovvn British F"'ub and Restaurant located at 780 I'V1ain Street. Zoning for the property is C-C (Central Commercial)" DovvntoVVI""l. Revitalization,. Core Area Overlay District. l'v1r_ IsersoTl summarized tl'1e staf-:C report" describing the history or this application. and "the proposed use. Sta:ty- had encouraged the applicant to speak vvith the neighbors regarding this use _ He noted that there vvould be no live entertainment,. and that the background recorded music V'Vould .not create a noise impact. He noted that the applicant intended to create an upscale,. family-style establishrn.ent" and that they currently ran a sirnilar establishment in Danville_ Staf':t- included a condition that vvould alloV\T the Plan.l-:ting Department to revieV\T the operations vvithin six months,. and to determine vvhether there are any issues. If staff vvas not able to resolve the issues,. the use permit V\Tould be brought before the Planning Commission. Staffvvas sensitive to the location of-late-night activities V\Then resictel"""lts are l'1earby,. and believed tl,at the lack of live en..tertainment V\Tas a positive elerncnt_ Staff proposed a l"1un--:J.ber of-- cOl"1ditions that vvould further reduce potential in'1pacts to tl"1e neighbors.,. and belicved that there V\Tere appropriate controls on.. the use permit to ensure that the restaurant and bar vvould not be a problem in the area_ JV1r_ Iserson noted that the site contained a 20 space parking lot" al'1d that parking V\fo"L1.Id be supplemented vvith valet and oltsite parking. He noted that tl""l.c site techl"1ically fulfilled its parking requirements because at the time that the building came in for development,. the City Council approved a parking in-lieu. agreemel-:tt for the building_ Staff encouraged the applicant to exalT1ine several parking solutions_ The applicant had an agreelTlen.t :trOITl tl"""le property OV\Tner at 173 Spring Street to use 23 parking spaces for valet parking_ Sl""l.e PLANNING COJ'VIJ'VIISSIC>N J'VIINUTES September 10,2003 Page 3 T.--~