My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
PC 091003
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
MINUTES
>
2000-2009
>
2003
>
PC 091003
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/14/2017 9:41:37 AM
Creation date
12/8/2005 10:19:09 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
9/10/2003
DOCUMENT NAME
PC-091003
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
24
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />the lack oTF~R guidelines "V\Tould lead to very large homes on these lots. She believed <br />that the 300 foot noticing radius vvas too small for this area" and requested that vvhen <br />Parcel 949001500501 comes before the Planning Department", that a public hearing be <br />held_ She believed that the Homeo"V\Tners ~ssociation should be l"1otified. <br /> <br />1'Vlr. Iserson noted that the 300-foot notification area vvould be increased_ <br /> <br />1'Vls. Ka"V\Taihau did not object to stucco homes" but did object to 7",000 square f:oot homes_ <br />She requested that developments in this area be brought before the Planning COITlmissioll. <br /> <br />TI-IE PUBLIC I-IEA.:RING VVA.S CL<:>SED. <br /> <br />Corn.mission..er Roberts advised that she vvould like the homes be broug11t before the <br />Planning Commission,. and noted that there vvere not many houses t.o be considered. <br /> <br />Chairperson ATkin noted that he vvould like the noticing area t.o be increased to 1,,000 <br />feet." and agreed vvith Commissioner Roberts" request. <br /> <br />Commissioner Roberts noted that she did not "V\Tant to reopen the Specific Plan at this <br />point. <br /> <br />:rv1:r. Iserson advised that if the Commission vvould like to add a stipulation to have the <br />plans brought before them", it vvas their prerogative. <br /> <br />Chairperson Arkin :noted that the lots had a unique flavor. <br /> <br />Commissioner Sullivan vvould like to clarify hovv many houses "V\Tcre being discussed. <br /> <br />Commissioner Roberts noted that annexation had not yet occurred. <br /> <br />Commissioner Sullivan noted that the City"'s design guidelines had been improved since <br />the Specific Plan vvas vvritten". and suggested that it be updated to include FAR guidelirl.es <br />and energy efficiency. I--Ie believed that the design guidelines sl"1ould be revisited_ <br /> <br />COll.'1missioncr Roberts noted that the Specific Plal"1 "V\Tould be re-visited as "V\TelL <br /> <br />Commissioner Sullivan advised that he vvould agree vvith reopening the Specific Plan. l--Ie <br />did not believe that the 300-foot notification should be accepted. <br /> <br />Commissioner R.obert:s moved t:o make a recommendat:ion t:o t:he Cit:y Council t:o <br />revie"" and revise the design guidelines and process only f"or this designation of" the <br />I-Iappy Valley Specific Plan" t:hat: t:he 300-"'00t: not:icing area be increased" and t:hat: <br />t:he Planning Commission revie-vv t:he cust:om homes. <br />Commissioner ~aas seconded t:he mo'tion. <br /> <br />PLA.N1'TIN"G COl'v1l'v1ISSION" l'v1IN"UTES September 10, 2003 <br /> <br />Page 2 I <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.