My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
PC 081303
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
MINUTES
>
2000-2009
>
2003
>
PC 081303
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/14/2017 9:41:23 AM
Creation date
12/8/2005 10:17:03 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
8/13/2003
DOCUMENT NAME
PC-081303
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
14
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />Conservation and Open Space Element <br /> <br />Commissioner Roberts advised that there are a number of issues in this area tl-"1at she feels <br />sl"1ould be combined vvith the Energy Element,. or there vvill be a lot of overlapping_ <br /> <br />"Noise Element <br /> <br />Commissioner Roberts suggested that issue #6 be moved to the Energy Element:. <br />Commissioner l\.!laas concurred_ <br /> <br />Communit:v C11aracter Element <br /> <br />Commissioner Roberts comn""l.ented that she feels tl-:te l-Ieritage Tree Ordinance is too <br />strict. <br /> <br />Con'1missioner lV1aas advised that she feels that. t.here needs to be education and avvareness <br />for the youtl""l. in our community regarding recycling. She suggested that appropriate <br />recycling bins be placed in the Cit:y parks and public areas to promote this avvareness. <br /> <br />Economic and Fiscal Element <br /> <br />Commissioner Roberts commented that there is a need to knovv th.e potential fiscal <br />impac1:s of proposed changes to the General Plan_ <br /> <br />Subregional Planning Element <br /> <br />ComlT'lissioner l\.!laas noted tl,a1: there vvas a recent request for Pleasanton representa1:ion <br />on. the Livermore ~irport Board" and the request vvas denied_ <br /> <br />l'v1r. Rasmussen revievved l'1is understanding of the folJovving recommendations and issues <br />t.hat vvould be carried forvvard in the General Plan LJpdate process as a result of the input <br />received 1:his evening. <br /> <br />~rhe Charnber of Commerce supports the staff report Option 2 l"1eighborhood concept <br />and that all information should be shared vvith all neighborhoods throughout the <br />process. <br />Include COLll""l.ty residents living beyond the Urban. Grovvth Boundary line in the <br />General Plan Update process. <br />Encourage Happy Valley residents vvho hook up to the City"s seV\ler and vvater <br />systelT1s and annex to the Ci1:y to develop second units in order t.o meet tl'1e City"s <br />110using goals and in order to preserve the existing neighborhood character. <br />Establish a Tri-Valley planning council t:hat vvould be more planning progressive. <br />Formal recommendation not to revisit the T-Iousing Element during the General Plan <br />Update. <br />l'/[ove Noise Element issue #6 to the El'1ergy Element section of-tl"1e '"'"Issues Report:."" <br /> <br />PL~NN"I~G COIV1l'VlISSIO~ l'VlIN~JTES <br /> <br />August 13,2003 <br /> <br />Page 12 <br /> <br />,......- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.