My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
PC 062503
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
MINUTES
>
2000-2009
>
2003
>
PC 062503
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/14/2017 9:40:58 AM
Creation date
12/8/2005 10:12:57 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
6/25/2003
DOCUMENT NAME
PC-062503
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
24
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
THE PUBLIC HEARING WAS CLOSED- <br />Commissioner Roberts moved that the Planning G'ommission find Yhat the City of <br />Pleasanton's Capital Improvement Program is in conformance with the City's <br />General Plan_ <br />Commissioner Maas seconded the motion- <br />ROLL CALL VOTE <br />AYES: Commissioners Arkin, Karneny, Maas, and Roberts <br />NOES: None <br />ABSTAIN: None <br />ASSENT: Commissioner Sullivan <br />Resolution No. PC-2003-27 was entered and adopted as n-iotioned_ <br />f_ Review of the utilization of affordable housing credits for affordable units <br />provided as part of the Busch property senior apartment proj ect_ <br />This item was continued <br />3. MATTERS INITIATED BY COMMISSION MEMBERS <br />Chairperson Arkin advised that at the first workshop on California Splash, he <br />recommended to staff that a workshop before City Council would be desirable- He <br />believed that the televised Council meetings would be useful in communicating the <br />information to the residents at large- He anticipated that the project would be <br />controversial, and has received intensive lobbying from citizens who oppose the project. <br />He noted that some citizens were considering an initi alive to stop the project. <br />Commissioner Maas believed that the normal procedures should be followed. <br />Mr_ lserson noted that after the Planning Comiriission takes action on the project, City <br />Council may decide to have a workshop, bui that it was not within his purview to place a <br />workshop on the Council agenda. <br />Commissioner Kemeny understood Chairperson Arkin's point of view, and noted that <br />many residents are not aware of some of these issues. <br />Commissioner Kan~eny noted that he was concerned about public safety and quality of <br />life issues, and had often experienced traffic congestion near schools during drop-off and <br />pick-up riiries. He believed it was a major safety concern, and inquired who he could <br />contact with respect to that issue. <br />Mr. Iscrson advised that he could contact the City "Traffic Engineer and the school <br />district. Iie noted that the options were limited with the school district. <br />PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES June 25, 2003 Page 22 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.