Laserfiche WebLink
The applicant was not in attendance at this meeting <br />in response to an inquiry by Commissioner Roberts, Ms. Norman confirmed that Mr. <br />Duggan moved into the house four months ago, and that it had been vacant for several <br />years. She noted that he did the work hin-tsel£, and did not hire contractors. She believed <br />that the fence constituted a hazard to the neighborhood children. She added that she and <br />her neighbors took pride of ownership in their homes, and that their patience was <br />exhausted. <br />Tn response to an inquiry by Commissioner Sedlak, Ms. Norman replied that membership <br />in the homeowners association was voluntary. <br />John Mannion, 3570 Kings Canyon Court, noted that the applicant's home had been in <br />disrepair for ten years, including twelve foot deep holes around the property. He advised <br />the City in 1997 that there were no windows in the house, and noted that an industrial-size <br />storage container was in the driveway for two years before it was removed_ He <br />acknowledged that a design review could not be denied because of prior actions, but he <br />believed this was an extraordinary situation. He did not believe the applicant could perform <br />all the work him sel£within the shortened time limits. <br />Elizabeth Rij s, 3533 Kings Canyon Court, noted that she had lived in the neighborhood for <br />eight years, and expressed concern about the unsightliness of the property. She noted that <br />the applicant had not made significant progress, and added that he demolished the front of <br />the house and dug the holes £or piers illegally and without building permits_ She did not <br />believe the applicant should receive the design review until the previous work had been <br />completed. She cited staff' s conclusions "With the approval of current application, staff <br />hopes that the applicant will follow through." She noted that the neighbors all hoped that <br />would occur, too. <br />Ron Potter, 3541 Kings Court, agreed with the other speakers, and expressed concern that <br />the applicant did not attend any of the hearings. He noted that the industrial container had <br />been on blocks in his driveway for several months, and that it had been a hazard to the <br />neighborhood children. He added that the house had sharp, jagged edges which were also a <br />hazard_ He hoped the City would be able to remedy the situation_ <br />Bruce M.uzica, 3484 Zion Canyon Court, noted that he moved to the neighborhood four <br />months ago, and added that he lived directly behind the house. He noted that the word <br />"tin-tely" was used. frequently in the sta££ report, and inquired whether the new work would <br />take many more years to complete. He acknowledged that the applicant could work on his <br />private property, and inquired whether a daily fine would provide an incentive to bring it to <br />completion. <br />Chairperson Arkin advised that the Commission and staff would try to £md a legal and fair <br />way to bring the work to completion and still protect the applicant's property rights. <br />PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES January 22, 2003 Page 13 <br />