Laserfiche WebLink
<br />R~sol~tio~ No. PC-94-67 <br />Pag~ :2 <br /> <br />properties a~d to be compatible ~ith the adjacent <br />r~ral residenti~l and agric~lt~ra.l ~ses. The <br />proposed b~ilding additions/modifications ~o~ld be <br />s~b~ect to separate design re~ie~ a.ppro~al to <br />ens~re that they ~o~ld be consist~~t ~ith the <br />architect~ral feat~res of the b~ilding. Therefore, <br />t.he. propc>se.d additions ar~ a.ppropriat~ for the <br />site. <br /> <br />13. <br /> <br />That t.he proposed <br />and the conditions <br />or maintained ~ill <br />health, safety, or <br />to the properties <br /> <br />location of the conditional ~se <br />under ~hich it ~o~ld be opera.ted <br />not be detrimental to the public <br />~elfare, or materia.lly in~~rio~s <br />or impro~ements in the ~icinity. <br /> <br />The proposed additions ~o~ld be located in <br />con~enient pro~imity and rel~tionship to the <br />exist.ing hc>~se so as to not req~ire grading or <br />remo~al of existing nat.i~e trees. While the <br />additions are an e~pansic>n of the li~ing area, it <br />is not a ne~ ~se for the area. Therefor~, the ~se <br />conditions (noise, parking, traffic, etc.) ~ould <br />not. create any additional, act~erse impact.s on <br />surro~nding properties. The addition ~ill also be <br />req~ired conform to all Building and Fire Code <br />req~irements. Therefore, if all the conditions of <br />approval are complied ~ith, the proposed e~pansion <br />of t.he house 'Will not detriment.ally impact the <br />surrounding ~ses_ <br /> <br />c. <br /> <br />That the proposed conditional use ~ill <br />each of t.he appl icable pro~isions of <br />ordinance. <br /> <br />comply ""ith <br />the zoning <br /> <br />Based on the disc~ssi~n in the staff rep~rt, the <br />proposed conditional use ~ill complY ~ith all <br />~ppli~able prc>~isi~ns ~f the z~nlng ~rdiTl.ance <br />(Chapter 18 of t.he M~nicipal Code). <br /> <br />'W"HEREAS, <br /> <br />pro~e~t.s ~f th~s nat.ure ~re ~~tegor~cally e~empt from the <br />req~irements ~f t.he california En~iro:n.ment.al Q~ality ~ct <br />(CEQA); a:rld <br /> <br />WHEREAS, <br /> <br />t.he Pla.:n.ning Cornmiss.i~n <br />additions are appr~pria.te <br />~ould maintain the rural <br /> <br />determ i:n.ed that <br />for the e~isting <br />character of the <br /> <br />the p:r:-oposed. <br />residence. and <br />area. . <br /> <br />NOW, THEREFORE, THE PLANNING CO~ISSIaN OF THE CITY OF PLEASANTON <br />R.ESOL~ES THE FOLLOWING: <br /> <br />"r <br /> <br />r <br /> <br />',"- <br />