My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
SR 05:340
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2005
>
SR 05:340
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/1/2005 2:58:10 PM
Creation date
12/1/2005 2:47:34 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
STAFF REPORTS
DOCUMENT DATE
12/6/2005
DESTRUCT DATE
15 Y
DOCUMENT NO
SR 05:340
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
12
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />of buildable lots on the o"W'ner's Lot even though no buildable lots, or not <br />the entire number of buildable lots allo"W'ed under the Specific Plan, "W'ould <br />initially be created. This proposed amendment "W'ould do a number of <br />things: It "W'ould allo"W' a property owner "W'ith a HillsidelLo"W' Density <br />Residential/Opens Space designated Lot to pay the Specific Plan fees "W'hen <br />a parcel or final map is approved but only for the buildable lots created by <br />the map; it "W'ould allo"W' a property o"W'ner "W'ith a Hillside/Open Space <br />designated Lot to pay the Specific Plan fees "W'hen a parcel or final map is <br />approved but only for the buildable lots until more than half of the <br />buildable lots are created at "W'hich time all the Specific Plan fees "W'ould be <br />due; it "W'ould require a property o"W'ner "W'ith an existing structure "W'ho <br />subdivides the property to pay the Specific Plan fees for any ne"W' buildable <br />lot and a portion of the fees for the existing structure; and it "W'ould require a <br />property o"W'ner "W'ith a vacant lot "W'ho did not intend to subdivide but did <br />intend to build (a single family home, for example) to pay the Specific Plan <br />fee for that Lot "W'hen the building permit "W'as issued. The amendment <br />"W'ould also permit a property o"W'ner "W'ith an existing home "W'ho "W'as not <br />subdividing the Lot but "W'anted to connect to the shared infrastructure to <br />pay Specific Plan fees associated "W'ith that connection rather than the fees <br />for all the buildable lots. Finally, because the City currently is last in line <br />to be reimbursed for expenses it has incurred in constructing improvements <br />("W'hen the Program "W'as adopted in 2000 it "W'as not contemplated that the <br />City "W'ould be a funding developer except for certain "W'ater system <br />improvements), staff is asking for direction to retum further amendments to <br />the Program to address this inequity. <br /> <br />Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council: <br /> <br />BACKGROUND <br /> <br />In March 2000, the City Council approved the "Shared Infrastructure Financing Program" for <br />the Vineyard Avenue Corridor Specific Plan. That Program, in part, provides "W'hen Specific <br />Plan fees are to be paid "W'hen the property o"W'ner elects to pay the fee in lieu of constructing <br />Specific Plan improvements. <br /> <br />Financing Program #7 provides that for subdivision of Lots (meaning the 33 "Lots" listed in <br />Table 111-1 of the Specific Plan) creating ne"W' buildable lots, the fees for all such lots shall be <br />paid at the time of the first final map (parcel or final map) approval. Financing Program #8 <br />provides that for Lots "W'ith existing homes, the Specific Plan fees are to be paid at the time a <br />building permit that results in the connection to the infrastructure improvements is issued or <br />"W'hen the first subdivision of the Lot occurs, "W'hichever is earlier. Finally, Financing Program <br /> <br />SR:05:340 <br />Page 2 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.