Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PLEASANTON <br /> ALAMEDA COUNTY, ALAMEDA <br /> RESOLUTION NO. 05-081 <br />4...'0 <br />RESOLUTION OF APPLICATION BY THE CITY OF <br />PLEASANTON REQUESTING THE LOCAL AGENCY <br />FORMATION COMMISSION TO TAKE PROCEEDINGS <br />FOR THE PROPOSED ANNEXATIONIDETACHMENT NO. <br />148 (VINEYARD A VENUE REALIGNMENT) PURSUANT TO <br />THE CORTESE-KNOX-HERTZBERG LOCAL <br />GOVERNMENT REORGANIZATION ACT OF 2000 <br />WHEREAS, the City of Pleasanton desires to initiate proceedings pursuant to the Cortese- <br />Knox-Hertzberg Local Government Reorganization Act of 2000, Division 3, <br />commencing with Section 56000 of the California Government Code, for the <br />annexation of approximately 11.18 acres and the detachment of 6.91 acres, <br />AnnexationlDetachment 148 (Vineyard Avenue Realignment), and requests <br />initiation of proceedings thereon; and <br />WHEREAS, the territory proposed to be annexed and detached are uninhabited, and a <br />description of the boundaries of the territory is set forth in Exhibit "A", attached <br />hereto and by this reference incorporated herein; and <br />WHEREAS, this proposal is consistent with the sphere of influence of the affected city; and <br />WHEREAS, the reasons for this proposed annexation/detachment are as follows: <br />This is a logical realignment of the City limits and the City of Pleasanton should <br />have control over the use and development of the property to be annexed; the City <br />has agreed to return the property proposed to be detached to its status as <br />unincorporated territory. <br />WHEREAS, as to 6.5 acres of land owned by Lonestar Industries that is proposed to be <br />annexed, the City has concerns about proposed uses on that property and therefore <br />requests that LAFCO impose, as condition of detachment, that the County of <br />Alameda refer to the City for its review and comment any land use applications <br />concerning this property. <br />