Laserfiche WebLink
<br />among other benchmark agencies, internal relationships between supervisory positions and <br />across departments, and the consumer price index (CPI). <br />In regards to benchmark agencies, the selection of agencies is based on a variety of factors, <br />including, but not limited to, regional and operational similarities, number of employees, <br />population served, etc,. The assumption is that benchmark agencies are typically faced with <br />the same organizational issues and generally compete for the same labor/talent pool. In <br />reviewing salary adjustments for benchmark agencies, staff found salary increases for <br />corresponding agencies ranged between 0% and 4.5% over the last 12 months (see <br />Attachment B). In addition to the survey information obtained, staff also reviewed the <br />Consumer Price Index (CPI) and found that the most recent numbers available for the San <br />Francisco-Oakland Bay Area illustrate that the CPI has fluctuated from a low of 1.1 % to a high <br />of 2.5% over this same 12-month period (see Attachment C). <br />Management and Confidential salaries are comprised of two major components; a control point <br />(or midpoint of the salary range) and a compa ratio. The control point reflects CPI and survey <br />information and is used as a benchmark for the classification's salary. The compa ratio reflects <br />the employees actual salary based on performance. If the Council approves the recommended <br />resolution, there will be a 3.5% adjustment in classification control points. However, the actual <br />salary increase given to an employee may be less or more than the 3.5% based solely on <br />performance. There are no automatic increases in compensation under the Management <br />Compensation Plan, rather the driving factor in the consideration of a salary increase is <br />whether the goals and objectives of the agency, for which that employee is responsible, are <br />being completed in a timely and productive manner as well as the employee's overall <br />performance, which is reviewed annually by the City Manager. <br />In conclusion, the Management Compensation Plan provides for the establishment annually of a <br />compensation pool for management and confidential employees. It is recommended that the <br />City Council approve the attached resolution approving a 3.5% compensation pool for <br />management and confidential employees. From this pool, the salaries of individual management <br />and confidential employees will be adjusted based solely on performance. <br />OTHER MATTERS <br />At the last meeting, some members of the public approached the Council with several questions <br />about the City's pay and compensation structure, as well as general concerns about the state of <br />public sector compensation and the need for reform. In an effort to address these issues and <br />raise public awareness at the local level, staff is suggesting the following concepts for <br />consideration by the City Council. <br />. Host a Special Workshop -- Approximately two years ago, the City hosted a special, <br />televised workshop on workers compensation reform. The workshop presented an <br />opportunity for Council and staff to discuss the City's workers compensation program, <br /> receive presentations from industry specialists, and hear public comment (pro and con). <br />At the workshop, the majority of the Council also took a position of support on two pieces <br /> of legislation that served as the primary catalyst for the state's successful workers <br /> compensation reform efforts. In an effort to address concerns and answer questions <br /> about public sector pay and compensation at the local and statewide level, the City <br /> Council may want to pursue a similar workshop strategy. The workshop would offer the <br />05:323 2 <br />