My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
SR 05:292 (2)
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2005
>
SR 05:292 (2)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/10/2005 9:21:32 AM
Creation date
11/10/2005 8:42:09 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
STAFF REPORTS
DOCUMENT DATE
11/15/2005
DESTRUCT DATE
15 Y
DOCUMENT NO
SR 05:292
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
11
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br /> CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PLEASANTON <br /> ALAMEDA COUNTY, ALAMEDA <br /> RESOLUTION NO. 05- <br /> RESOLUTION OF APPLICATION BY THE CITY OF <br /> PLEASANTON REQUESTING THE LOCAL AGENCY <br /> FORMATION COMMISSION TO TAKE PROCEEDINGS <br /> FOR THE PROPOSED ANNEXATIONIDETACHMENT NO. <br /> 148 (VINEYARD A VENUE REALIGNMENT) PURSUANT TO <br /> THE CORTESE-KNOX-HERTZBERG LOCAL <br /> GOVERNMENT REORGANIZATION ACT OF 2000 <br />WHEREAS, the City of Pleasanton desires to initiate proceedings pursuant to the Cortese- <br /> Knox-Hertzberg Local Government Reorganization Act of 2000, Division 3, <br /> commencing with Section 56000 of the California Government Code, for the <br /> annexation of approximately 11.18 acres and the detachment of 6.91 acres, <br /> Annexation/Detachment 148 (Vineyard Avenue Realignment), and requests <br /> initiation of proceedings thereon; and <br />WHEREAS, the territory proposed to be annexed and detached are uninhabited, and a <br /> description of the boundaries of the territory is set forth in Exhibit "A", attached <br /> hereto and by this reference incorporated herein; and <br />WHEREAS, this proposal is consistent with the sphere of influence ofthe affected city; and <br />WHEREAS, the reasons for this proposed annexation/detachment are as follows: <br /> This is a logical realignment of the City limits and the City of Pleasanton should <br /> have control over the use and development of the property to be annexed; the City <br /> has agreed to return the property proposed to be detached to its status as <br /> unincorporated territory. <br />WHEREAS, as to 6.5 acres of land owned by Lonestar Industries that is proposed to be <br /> annexed, the City has concerns about proposed uses on that property and therefore <br /> requests that LAFCo impose, as condition of detachment, that the County of <br /> Alameda refer to the City for its review and comment any land use applications <br /> concerning this property. <br /> EXHIBIT c... <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.