My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
SR 05:292 (2)
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2005
>
SR 05:292 (2)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/10/2005 9:21:32 AM
Creation date
11/10/2005 8:42:09 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
STAFF REPORTS
DOCUMENT DATE
11/15/2005
DESTRUCT DATE
15 Y
DOCUMENT NO
SR 05:292
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
11
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />The subject annexation is contiguous to the City limits and is within the City's Urban Growth <br />Boundary. This annexation is a logical expansion of the City boundary and would allow <br />appropriate control for future development. <br />As to the detachments, there is no need to retain the .182 acres north of the right of way for <br />public purposes and the current landowner (Greenbriar Homes) cannot use the property for any <br />development purposes. (Greenbriar will process a lot line adjustment with Lonestar in order to <br />merge the acreage into Lonestar's other County property.) In that the Lonestar parcel north of <br />the realigned Vineyard Avenue is encumbered with a storm drain detention pond (that the City <br />maintains) and will continue to be used indefinitely for mining/industrial purposes (as allowed <br />under the Specific Plan), and in recognition that the City has agreed to initiate the detachment of <br />this property, this item is before Council for action. <br />AnnexationlDetachment Procedures <br />As to the private properties, the owners have requested that their properties be <br />annexed/detached. City staff has reviewed their requests for compliance with the City's General <br />Plan and LAFCo's policies regarding annexation/detachment and concludes that they comply. <br />The surrounding property owners have been notified that this matter will be considered by the <br />City Council at its November 15 meeting. <br />In order for the annexation/detachment to proceed, the Council will need to adopt a resolution <br />formally initiating the annexation/detachment with LAFCo and agreeing to the exchange of <br />property taxes with Alameda County. <br />The annexation/detachment application is submitted to LAFCo staff for its review. Once <br />LAFCo staff is satisfied that all requirements have been completed, the matter is scheduled for a <br />public hearing for action by LAFCo. <br />LAFCo may approve the application with either revisions or conditions; it may also decide not <br />to approve the application. The annexation/detachment becomes effective when it is formally <br />recorded with Alameda County. <br />Recommendation <br />Staff recommends the Council adopt a resolution formally initiating the annexation/detachment <br />of the properties in question. With regard to the Lonestar parcel, the resolution will include <br />language asking LAFCo to impose as a condition of detachment that the County refer to the City <br />for review and comment any land use applications filed for that property. That notice will <br />provide the opportunity for the City and residents near the site to be heard on proposed uses of <br />the site. <br />SR:05:292 <br />Page 4 of 5 <br /> -----.-- . <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.