My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
ORD 1804
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
ORDINANCES
>
1801 - 1900
>
ORD 1804
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/30/2023 4:24:07 PM
Creation date
6/9/2000 5:32:51 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
ORDINANCES
DOCUMENT DATE
5/16/2000
DOCUMENT NO
ORD 1804
Tags
Ordinance
Description:
Ordinance
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
4
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
WHEREAS, <br /> <br />WHEREAS, <br /> <br />WHEREAS, <br />WHEREAS, <br />WHEREAS, <br />WHEREAS, <br />WHEREAS, <br /> <br />WHEREAS, <br /> <br />CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PLEASANTON <br />ALAMEDA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA <br />ORDINANCE NO. 1804 <br /> <br />AN ORDINANCE APPROVING A SECOND AMENDMENT <br />TO THE DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT WITH THE <br />SECURITY TRUST COMPANY REGARDING THE <br />STONERIDGE REGIONAL SHOPPING CENTER <br /> <br />Government Code Section 65865 through Section 65869.5 authorizes cities and <br />cormties to enter into binding development agreements with persons having legal <br />or equitable interests in real property for the development of such property; and <br /> <br />in 1992, the City of Pleasanton adopted Ordinance No. 1578, approving a <br />development agreement between the City and the Security Truest Company, for the <br />Stoneridge Regional Shopping Cemer; and <br /> <br />in 1997, the Security Trust Company applied to the City for an amendment to the <br />development agreement; and <br /> <br />in January 1998, the City Council approved the First Amendment to the <br />development agreement; and <br /> <br />in December 1999, the Security Trust Company applied to the City for a Second <br />Amendment to the development agreement; and <br /> <br />after public notice, the Planning Commission held a hearing and reconunended <br />approval of the Second Amendment to the development agreement; and <br /> <br />at its meeting of May 2, 2000, the City Coancil reviewed the staff report from the <br />Director of Planning and Community Development (SR 00:067) together with a <br />copy of the staff report to the Planning Commission regarding this marker; and <br /> <br />on May 2, 2000, a duly-noticed public hearing was held, at which time the <br />applicant and all other members of the public were offered an oppommity to <br />present evidence regarding the Second Amendinent to the development agreement; <br />and <br /> <br />WHEREAS, minor changes to land use regulations such as this application are categorically <br /> exempt from CEQA; and <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.