My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
SR 05:268
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2005
>
SR 05:268
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/23/2005 9:49:20 AM
Creation date
9/23/2005 9:47:02 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
STAFF REPORTS
DOCUMENT DATE
9/27/2005
DESTRUCT DATE
15 Y
DOCUMENT NO
SR 05:268
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
12
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />. Memo #1: Land Use Overview <br />. Memo #2: Potential Additional Housing Sites <br />. Memo #3: Land Use - East Area <br />. Memo #4: High Density Housing Sites <br />. Memo #5: Hacienda Business Park <br />. Memo #6: Southeast Pleasanton Area <br />. Memo #7: Other Remaining Undeveloped Land <br />A total of 52 sites were discussed. Some were vacant and underutilized sites identified by staff; <br />others were requests from owners or potential developers to consider land use changes. A <br />complete listing of the sites discussed is shown in Attachment 1. The City Council may in the <br />future decide to eliminate some of these sites from consideration either because the owners have <br />no further interest in pursuing a land use designation change (for example, the Vintage Hills <br />Shopping Center, which is now undergoing rehabilitation and will continue as a commercial <br />center), or for other planning reasons. All the sites considered in the previous Land Use Memos <br />are shown in Attachment I: Table 1, grouped geographically for the purposes of City Council <br />and Planning Commission consideration at future workshops (see below). The City Council is <br />being asked to provide direction to staff regarding any additional sites that should be added to the <br />list. The owners of all the sites listed in Table I were notified that their property may be <br />discussed at this meeting. <br />OTHER LAND USE ISSUES TO BE DISCUSSED AND RESOLVED <br />Other than potential changes in land use designations, there are several additional issues that <br />need to be discussed and resolved prior to the drafting of the Land Use Element. These include: <br />. Assisted living units and second units: Should they continue to not be considered as <br /> residential units in the Growth Management Plan allocation, and the 29,000 housing unit <br /> cap, or should they be counted as housing units? Assisted living units mayor may not <br /> have full kitchen facilities and include an element of congregate living such as meals <br /> served in a central dining room and the provision of a variety of services. In addition, <br /> such uses may have a substantial number of employees. For these reasons, in the past, the <br /> City has considered assisted living projects as commercial development. Two assisted <br /> living projects in Pleasanton have been developed on sites designated for commercial use, <br /> have paid commercial fees, and have not been counted as "housing units". The recently <br /> approved assisted living facility to be located at 100 Junipero Road is being developed on <br /> land designated High Density Residential on the General Plan but the rooms were not <br /> counted as "housing units", and the project was exempted from most development impact <br /> fees. It will be important for the City Council to determine how assisted living units are <br /> categorized so that the Staples Ranch and Hacienda Transit Oriented Development <br />SR 05:268 <br />Page 3 of6 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.